Posts belonging to Category 'Cocaine Addicts'

Too much text messaging?

Question:

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:13:25 -0500 (CDT), OLT…@webtv.net (GT Tick) wrote in alt.support.mult-sclerosis:

In the Sunday Telegraph newspaper the head of the clinic’s addictions unit said some patients were spending up to seven hours a day text messaging.

And .. real crazies .. spend .. even .. longer .. ? It .. takes .. time .. to  .. copy .. and .. paste .. Who loves ya. Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -doe <ironjust…@aol.comdoe

wrote in message <news:680e65504abff3cd47b705eae964f2c3@news.teranews.com… On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:13:25 -0500 (CDT), OLT…@webtv.net (GT Tick) wrote in alt.support.mult-sclerosis: In the Sunday Telegraph newspaper the head of the clinic’s addictions unit said some patients were spending up to seven hours a day text messaging. And .. real crazies .. spend .. even .. longer .. ? It .. takes .. time .. to  .. copy .. and .. paste .. Who loves ya. Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking

But the clinic is often used be celebs for drug addiction,so it’s quite an expensive place. With Dumb,I mean tom not working he wouldn’t have the money to go there. Iron is the cause of many of the worlds problems. Arnold would only grope women after he had eaten some iron

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -OLT…@webtv.net (GT Tick) wrote in message <news:10779-3F820525-331@storefull-2357.public.lawson.webtv.net

… Very much on topic I would guess.   — — Excessive Texting May Be Sign of Addiction? Mon Oct 6,10:11 AM ET LONDON (Reuters) –  Too much text messaging? You may need professional help.    More and more people are succumbing to so called "technology addictions," spending hours tapping on mobile phones or surfing the Internet, one of Britain’s best known psychiatric clinics said Saturday. "There has been a huge rise in behavioral addictions," including excessive texting, said a spokeswoman for the Priory Clinic which treats 6,000 patients a year for a range of addictions including gambling, eating disorders and drugs.

Anything can be an "addiction," if you allow it to take over your life. But I think I’d rather spend too much time on my computer than too much time (and money!) gambling, drinking, eating, shopping. . . I have heard of relationships being broken by the Internet, but that’s because people are just using a new technology for an old activity: cheating. Unless people are neglecting the essentials of life because they’re on the Internet, I don’t see what the problem is. That goes for any activity, no matter how healthy it is supposed to be. I have heard of people who are addicted to exercise. And sometimes an "addiction" is necessary to accomplish something; think of the hours and hours a day musicians practice, writers write, artists paint, scientists spend in the lab. . .you could go on and on.  Many worthwhile activities take up a lot of time and energy. Without these addictions, the world would be a much poorer place. Sylvia

Response:

<pokes sylvia

Um..I think he was thinking of doe…………. — Laura "Sylvia" <Sylv772…@yahoo.com

wrote in message

news:e43f7f84.0310071207.40588e85@posting.google.com…

OLT…@webtv.net (GT Tick) wrote in message

<news:10779-3F820525-331@storefull-2357.public.lawson.webtv.net

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

Very much on topic I would guess. — — Excessive Texting May Be Sign of Addiction? Mon Oct 6,10:11 AM ET LONDON (Reuters) –  Too much text messaging? You may need professional help.  More and more people are succumbing to so called "technology addictions," spending hours tapping on mobile phones or surfing the Internet, one of Britain’s best known psychiatric clinics said Saturday. "There has been a huge rise in behavioral addictions," including excessive texting, said a spokeswoman for the Priory Clinic which treats 6,000 patients a year for a range of addictions including gambling, eating disorders and drugs. Anything can be an "addiction," if you allow it to take over your life. But I think I’d rather spend too much time on my computer than too much time (and money!) gambling, drinking, eating, shopping. . . I have heard of relationships being broken by the Internet, but that’s because people are just using a new technology for an old activity: cheating. Unless people are neglecting the essentials of life because they’re on the Internet, I don’t see what the problem is. That goes for any activity, no matter how healthy it is supposed to be. I have heard of people who are addicted to exercise. And sometimes an "addiction" is necessary to accomplish something; think of the hours and hours a day musicians practice, writers write, artists paint, scientists spend in the lab. . .you could go on and on.  Many worthwhile activities take up a lot of time and energy. Without these addictions, the world would be a much poorer place. Sylvia

Response:

It certainly brought him out of his coffin before sunset…. Tick — — Group: alt.support.mult-sclerosis Date: Tue, Oct 7, 2003, 11:00pm (CDT+5) From: the_happy_w…@myrealbox.bom (Laura) <pokes sylvia

Um..I think he was thinking of doe…………. — Laura *****Don’t Cry Because It’s Over…Smile Because It Happened.***** Visit Me At "TICK’S PLACE" http://community.webtv.net/OLTICK/TICKSPLACE

Response:

Laura writes:

<pokes sylvia Um..I think he was thinking of doe…………. —

Shreik!!!!  Giggle!!!!  Oh, don’t poke me!  I’m very ticklish! Coming to senses now. . .yeah, I think you’re right. Tick did hit his intended target! Sylvia

Response:

Very much on topic I would guess.   — — Excessive Texting May Be Sign of Addiction? Mon Oct 6,10:11 AM ET LONDON (Reuters) –  Too much text messaging? You may need professional help.  

Holy sh!t! Is this true?!?

Question:

Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Response:

Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Maddie, I have never heard this story – remember – don’t believe everything you read on Al Gore’s fabulous internet!!  So now I am curious, tell us about your quit method, and why this idea would throw it out the effin’ window?  I bet even if it is true, it is something that can be overcome!   -JoeD, non-smoker since October 3, 2001

Response:

That’s one of the stupider quit myths I’ve heard. I don’t know what your "quit method" is, but it will work if you don’t put a cigarette in your mouth, even if you throw it "out the effin’ window." Just don’t smoke  :-) epvof

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Response:

"Maddie"  wrote Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble…

NO. This was a typo. It’s "hat soluble", meaning it dissolves in your hat. When you quit, be sure to keep all your hats locked in a closet for a month until the nicotine dries up. After that, it’s safe to wear them again, as long as you don’t smoke.

Response:

Isn’t that how "they" detect that someones been smoking the jagged-edged leaf because it hides in your fat cells? This is interesting. I’d like a scientific explanation on this one… If tobacco is going to hide there in there too, that has got to be one hell of a FAT cell!!! It seems to me that chemicals have an expiration date also. A "must use before 04/01/1518" kinda thing or they lose their potency. I don’t know. It’s easy to confuse people when they’ve obviously got bloodshot eyes. Clear-eyed since (Oh, never mind!)

Response:

Isn’t that how "they" detect that someones been smoking the jagged-edged leaf because it hides in your fat cells? This is interesting. I’d like a scientific explanation on this one… If tobacco is going to hide there in there too, that has got to be one hell of a FAT cell!!! It seems to me that chemicals have an expiration date also. A "must use before 04/01/1518" kinda thing or they lose their potency. I don’t know. It’s easy to confuse people when they’ve obviously got bloodshot eyes. Clear-eyed since (Oh, never mind!)

I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? *hugs* *confused about the content of pee* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Response:

I tested negative for tobacco about 30 days into my quit and have had lower insurance rates ever since! I think the test measures CO2 in the blood though. (Ok, the pee..) I don’t think it can actually detect "nicotine". Thanks for reminding me Binnie. Another benefit of being quit!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? *hugs* *confused about the content of pee* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com Good grief.  Wouldn’t it be easier to just sniff you? Kim 10M

ROFLMAO!!!  It gets MY vote, Kim! :^D *hugs* —    BinnieBee – A Proud Old Fogie!         %%       (—-)      ( __< )      ^^ ~~ ^^      ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://cyberdigs.com

Response:

Ya Maddie!  I agree with Joe. I think this theory about stuff hiding in fat cells is being stretched a little too far. (Hmmm- but I have mysteriously gained a few pounds since my quit.)  It’s a convenient explanation why you might feel a crave 6 months to a year down the road, but I seriously doubt that it’s anything more than amusing. I’m a cold-turkey quitter also, although I have quit with NRT lots of times!!!    :-) Besides, are you going to worry about the miniscule particles of matter (that might not even be there), or the clouds of smoke that you would inhale daily??? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – -JoeD nicotine time bombs hidden in fat globules

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – JoeD: … So now I am curious, tell us about your quit method, and why this idea would throw it out the effin’ window? … Well, JoeD, you old fogey plus, my quit is sorta centered on the idea that nicotine withdrawal is the tenth, and least-publicized, circle of Hell. Quitting cold turkey is *supposed* to be the quickest and more painful way of getting oneself off of the nicotine. My plan is two-fold. First, off of nicotine the fastest possible way. Second, stock up on unpleasant experiences whilst withdrawing from nicotine so as to deter me from ever smoking again (which would make me want to quit again which would make me have to withdraw again). So, if I have little nicotine time bombs hidden in my fat globules just waiting to screw with me…ah, f_ck it all. Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003 [I'm doing it, even if I'm not liking it (-_-)]

hey Maddie, I did not read all the responses to your question here – but I don’t buy this ‘nicotine time bombs hidden in fat globules’ theory at all!  I quit cold turkey – and I did not cheat, not once.  And plenty of other people here quit cold turkey too!  And yes, it was hell for a *relatively short time!!*, but it was doable.  I survived anyway – and I am not some tuff guy either.  Give me a tight pair of shoes and I am gonna wail.  You can do this Maddie – nicotine globules or not..!! -JoeD nicotine time bombs hidden in fat globules  <– a line I must remember!

Response:

i have always believed that clearance is more than 72 hours, and i think as studies continue  they  will find that its longer than the 7-14 days too!

Oh the two are not incompatible….. Your body would be clear of all adverse (and positive) effects of cannabis after a few hours. No cognitive test would be able to detect it’s presence. But a urine test would show positive for about a month. One of the arguments advanced against the use of mandatory drug testing in UK prisons was this very fact. Heroin is un detectable after 3 days. The argument suggested that the introduction of this testing would encourage the use of harder drugs in our prisons, due to the much reduced chances of being caught. This has since proven to be the case. steveb

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? *hugs* *confused about the content of pee* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Good grief.  Wouldn’t it be easier to just sniff you? Kim 10M

Response:

Never heard of this, Maddie. FWIW, any quit method that is keeping you from sticking cigarettes in your mouth is a method that is working.  Don’t worry about the minute detail as that can be dealt with later.  Whatever it is that you are doing today is way healthier than what you were doing a week ago, and your ability to do even more healthy things for yourself will grow with each passing day. Just don’t stick a cigarette in your mouth.  That is all you have to do. hugs, elle — "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." -James Branch Cabell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Response:

JoeD: … So now I am curious, tell us about your quit method, and why this idea would throw it out the effin’ window?

… Well, JoeD, you old fogey plus, my quit is sorta centered on the idea that nicotine withdrawal is the tenth, and least-publicized, circle of Hell. Quitting cold turkey is *supposed* to be the quickest and more painful way of getting oneself off of the nicotine. My plan is two-fold. First, off of nicotine the fastest possible way. Second, stock up on unpleasant experiences whilst withdrawing from nicotine so as to deter me from ever smoking again (which would make me want to quit again which would make me have to withdraw again). So, if I have little nicotine time bombs hidden in my fat globules just waiting to screw with me…ah, f_ck it all. Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003 [I'm doing it, even if I'm not liking it (-_-)]

Response:

Sorry to bore, but you asked ;) Pharmacokinetics General pharmacokinetic properties of nicotine The volume of distribution following i.v. administration of nicotine is about 2 to 3 L/kg. Plasma protein binding of nicotine is <5%. Therefore, changes in nicotine binding from use of concomitant drugs or alterations of plasma proteins by disease states would not be expected to have significant effects on nicotine kinetics. The average plasma clearance following intravenous administration of nicotine is about 70 L/hour and the terminal half-life approximately 2 hours. The major eliminating organ is the liver, but the kidney and lung also metabolise nicotine. There is no significant skin metabolism of nicotine. More than 20 metabolites of nicotine have been identified, all of which are believed to be less active than the parent compound. The primary metabolite of nicotine in plasma, cotinine, has a half-life of 15 to 20 hours and concentrations exceed nicotine by 10-fold. The primary urinary metabolites are cotinine (15% of the dose) and trans-3-hydroxycotinine (45% of the dose). About 10% of nicotine is excreted unchanged in the urine, but as much as 30% may be excreted unchanged in urine with high flow rates and acidification of the urine below pH 5. http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/Datasheet/n/Nicorettegum.htm We now know that the component of a drug of abuse that we get addicted to is the metabolite of the drug, not the drug itself. This is a terribly important concept. In other words, heroin is converted to morphine in less than 120 seconds after it hits the bloodstream. We don’t really have heroin addicts, we have morphine addicts. We don’t really have cocaine addicts, we have benzoylecgonine addicts. Even alcohol has a metabolite. Nicotine has a metabolite called cotinine. Marijuana has two primary metabolites. It is the metabolite that supports the addiction. **It is the metabolite that gets stored in the body fat, and to some extent it is the metabolite that gives you some of the signs of drug influence.*** Certainly the long-term effects of the drugs derive from the metabolites. http://www.holisticwebs.com/program/narconon3.html Tobacco smoking results in the absorption of nicotine through the lung and buccal/nasal epithelium, after which nicotine is metabolized into about 20 metabolites excreted in urine. Cotinine, a major metabolite, accumulates in the body with regular smoking. It is reported that cotinine is stable in body fluids and has a relatively long half life of approximately 17 hours. Therefore, the detection of cotinine is less dependent on the time of sampling than that of nicotine and other metabolites. Cotinine has been widely used as a biomarker of tobacco exposure. Methods of analysis for cotinine in biological fluids include gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, HPLC, HPLC-mass spectrometry, EIA and RIA. These methods usually require special equipment and complicated operation procedures. The Smoke Check Test is a one step immunoassay that is used for the qualitative detection of cotinine in human urine. It is based on the principle of highly specific immunochemical reactions of antigens and antibodies. It is a simple and convenient test for the rapid qualitative detection of cotinine in human urine at 200 ng/ml cut-off concentration. http://www.xpressdrugtest.com/smokeCheck.html Typical drug detection/clearance times for a chronic smoker 7-14days http://www.craigmedical.com/drug_test_faq.htm

Response:

Typical drug detection/clearance times for a chronic smoker 7-14days http://www.craigmedical.com/drug_test_faq.htm

THANKS kita! i have always believed that clearance is more than 72 hours, and i think as studies continue  they  will find that its longer than the 7-14 days too! there is alot to be discovered about the bodies ability "to store" chemicals! rosie

Response:

PLEASE tell me this isn’t true!

It isn’t true!

Response:

"Kita" We now know that the component of a drug of abuse that we get addicted to is the metabolite of the drug, not the drug itself.

Of course we do Dear… Now go to sleep!!!

Response:

"Kita" We now know that the component of a drug of abuse that we get addicted to is the metabolite of the drug, not the drug itself. Of course we do Dear… Now go to sleep!!!

LOL Sorry, I’m up for the day, 18 more hours of pharmacokinetic lectures on cotinine and nicotine if you want.. you ready? :P :)

Response:

I tested negative for tobacco about 30 days into my quit and have had lower insurance rates ever since! I think the test measures CO2 in the blood though. (Ok, the pee..) I don’t think it can actually detect "nicotine". Thanks for reminding me Binnie. Another benefit of being quit!

My "guys" at work (I happen to be a LIfe/Health insurance agent) said it’d show up until a year, and now they say by June (my renewal date) I can put in for a "2-Year non-tobacco" and get even better rates (although it will not have been 2 years until November, and that’s for smoking. I used a slight amount of NRT, maybe not enough to have shown up but I wasn’t sure, up until about Feb of 2002.  So…we’ll see.  But just one year clean more than halved my rate! *hugs* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Response:

"BinnieBee" wrote I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance?????

For the same reason they make you undress and put on one of those cheesy paper gowns when you go to the doctor complaining about– oh, I dunno….foot pain, or a sinus infection, for example. I think it’s just to inconvenience you and cop a cheap thrill at your expense. Medical personnel get away with doing a lot of weird things that we wouldn’t tolerate from other service workers, if you think about it for a minute. Nobody else gets to make you get naked and give them your bodily fluids as a pre-condition for doing business with them. Well, hardly anybody else…

Response:

Their bullshitting you Binnie! I’d get some insurance with a different company… screw those thieves! You’ve already confessed… My insurance guy does professional football teams and he knows how much drugs those suckers do! (He wanted me to flush my system, but I’m honest    :-) HEY!!!  Someone’s actually joined me in Silkquit!!!      company< :-p~~~~~~

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "BinnieBee" wrote I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? For the same reason they make you undress and put on one of those cheesy paper gowns when you go to the doctor complaining about– oh, I dunno….foot pain, or a sinus infection, for example. I think it’s just to inconvenience you and cop a cheap thrill at your expense. Medical personnel get away with doing a lot of weird things that we wouldn’t tolerate from other service workers, if you think about it for a minute. Nobody else gets to make you get naked and give them your bodily fluids as a pre-condition for doing business with them. Well, hardly anybody else…

Now you’ve got a great point there! *hugs* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Response:

"BinnieBee"  wrote Good grief.  Wouldn’t it be easier to just sniff you? ROFLMAO!!!  It gets MY vote, Kim! :^D

Remember how when we smoked we fooled ourselves into thinking that we could disguise that fact, or hide it from others, by chewing a piece of gum, or spritzing on some after shave or perfume? Like it was going to magically hide our years-long indulgence in inhaling poisonous gasses, and strip the disgusting, lingering odor out of our skin, hair, clothing, etc…? I went to the doctor a while ago, and was delighted to answer "no"–and to inform her that it’d been over 3 years since I quit– when she asked if I was a smoker. A moment later, it sank in, and I felt like blurting out "What? You mean you couldn’t just *sniff* me and tell that…? Come on!"

Response:

Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Response:

Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Maddie, I have never heard this story – remember – don’t believe everything you read on Al Gore’s fabulous internet!!  So now I am curious, tell us about your quit method, and why this idea would throw it out the effin’ window?  I bet even if it is true, it is something that can be overcome!   -JoeD, non-smoker since October 3, 2001

Response:

That’s one of the stupider quit myths I’ve heard. I don’t know what your "quit method" is, but it will work if you don’t put a cigarette in your mouth, even if you throw it "out the effin’ window." Just don’t smoke  :-) epvof

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Response:

"Maddie"  wrote Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble…

NO. This was a typo. It’s "hat soluble", meaning it dissolves in your hat. When you quit, be sure to keep all your hats locked in a closet for a month until the nicotine dries up. After that, it’s safe to wear them again, as long as you don’t smoke.

Response:

Isn’t that how "they" detect that someones been smoking the jagged-edged leaf because it hides in your fat cells? This is interesting. I’d like a scientific explanation on this one… If tobacco is going to hide there in there too, that has got to be one hell of a FAT cell!!! It seems to me that chemicals have an expiration date also. A "must use before 04/01/1518" kinda thing or they lose their potency. I don’t know. It’s easy to confuse people when they’ve obviously got bloodshot eyes. Clear-eyed since (Oh, never mind!)

Response:

Isn’t that how "they" detect that someones been smoking the jagged-edged leaf because it hides in your fat cells? This is interesting. I’d like a scientific explanation on this one… If tobacco is going to hide there in there too, that has got to be one hell of a FAT cell!!! It seems to me that chemicals have an expiration date also. A "must use before 04/01/1518" kinda thing or they lose their potency. I don’t know. It’s easy to confuse people when they’ve obviously got bloodshot eyes. Clear-eyed since (Oh, never mind!)

I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? *hugs* *confused about the content of pee* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Response:

I tested negative for tobacco about 30 days into my quit and have had lower insurance rates ever since! I think the test measures CO2 in the blood though. (Ok, the pee..) I don’t think it can actually detect "nicotine". Thanks for reminding me Binnie. Another benefit of being quit!

Response:

I tested negative for tobacco about 30 days into my quit and have had lower insurance rates ever since! I think the test measures CO2 in the blood though. (Ok, the pee..) I don’t think it can actually detect "nicotine". Thanks for reminding me Binnie. Another benefit of being quit!

My "guys" at work (I happen to be a LIfe/Health insurance agent) said it’d show up until a year, and now they say by June (my renewal date) I can put in for a "2-Year non-tobacco" and get even better rates (although it will not have been 2 years until November, and that’s for smoking. I used a slight amount of NRT, maybe not enough to have shown up but I wasn’t sure, up until about Feb of 2002.  So…we’ll see.  But just one year clean more than halved my rate! *hugs* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Response:

"BinnieBee" wrote I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance?????

For the same reason they make you undress and put on one of those cheesy paper gowns when you go to the doctor complaining about– oh, I dunno….foot pain, or a sinus infection, for example. I think it’s just to inconvenience you and cop a cheap thrill at your expense. Medical personnel get away with doing a lot of weird things that we wouldn’t tolerate from other service workers, if you think about it for a minute. Nobody else gets to make you get naked and give them your bodily fluids as a pre-condition for doing business with them. Well, hardly anybody else…

Response:

Their bullshitting you Binnie! I’d get some insurance with a different company… screw those thieves! You’ve already confessed… My insurance guy does professional football teams and he knows how much drugs those suckers do! (He wanted me to flush my system, but I’m honest    :-) HEY!!!  Someone’s actually joined me in Silkquit!!!      company< :-p~~~~~~

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "BinnieBee" wrote I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? For the same reason they make you undress and put on one of those cheesy paper gowns when you go to the doctor complaining about– oh, I dunno….foot pain, or a sinus infection, for example. I think it’s just to inconvenience you and cop a cheap thrill at your expense. Medical personnel get away with doing a lot of weird things that we wouldn’t tolerate from other service workers, if you think about it for a minute. Nobody else gets to make you get naked and give them your bodily fluids as a pre-condition for doing business with them. Well, hardly anybody else…

Now you’ve got a great point there! *hugs* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Response:

JoeD: … So now I am curious, tell us about your quit method, and why this idea would throw it out the effin’ window?

… Well, JoeD, you old fogey plus, my quit is sorta centered on the idea that nicotine withdrawal is the tenth, and least-publicized, circle of Hell. Quitting cold turkey is *supposed* to be the quickest and more painful way of getting oneself off of the nicotine. My plan is two-fold. First, off of nicotine the fastest possible way. Second, stock up on unpleasant experiences whilst withdrawing from nicotine so as to deter me from ever smoking again (which would make me want to quit again which would make me have to withdraw again). So, if I have little nicotine time bombs hidden in my fat globules just waiting to screw with me…ah, f_ck it all. Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003 [I'm doing it, even if I'm not liking it (-_-)]

Response:

Sorry to bore, but you asked ;) Pharmacokinetics General pharmacokinetic properties of nicotine The volume of distribution following i.v. administration of nicotine is about 2 to 3 L/kg. Plasma protein binding of nicotine is <5%. Therefore, changes in nicotine binding from use of concomitant drugs or alterations of plasma proteins by disease states would not be expected to have significant effects on nicotine kinetics. The average plasma clearance following intravenous administration of nicotine is about 70 L/hour and the terminal half-life approximately 2 hours. The major eliminating organ is the liver, but the kidney and lung also metabolise nicotine. There is no significant skin metabolism of nicotine. More than 20 metabolites of nicotine have been identified, all of which are believed to be less active than the parent compound. The primary metabolite of nicotine in plasma, cotinine, has a half-life of 15 to 20 hours and concentrations exceed nicotine by 10-fold. The primary urinary metabolites are cotinine (15% of the dose) and trans-3-hydroxycotinine (45% of the dose). About 10% of nicotine is excreted unchanged in the urine, but as much as 30% may be excreted unchanged in urine with high flow rates and acidification of the urine below pH 5. http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/Datasheet/n/Nicorettegum.htm We now know that the component of a drug of abuse that we get addicted to is the metabolite of the drug, not the drug itself. This is a terribly important concept. In other words, heroin is converted to morphine in less than 120 seconds after it hits the bloodstream. We don’t really have heroin addicts, we have morphine addicts. We don’t really have cocaine addicts, we have benzoylecgonine addicts. Even alcohol has a metabolite. Nicotine has a metabolite called cotinine. Marijuana has two primary metabolites. It is the metabolite that supports the addiction. **It is the metabolite that gets stored in the body fat, and to some extent it is the metabolite that gives you some of the signs of drug influence.*** Certainly the long-term effects of the drugs derive from the metabolites. http://www.holisticwebs.com/program/narconon3.html Tobacco smoking results in the absorption of nicotine through the lung and buccal/nasal epithelium, after which nicotine is metabolized into about 20 metabolites excreted in urine. Cotinine, a major metabolite, accumulates in the body with regular smoking. It is reported that cotinine is stable in body fluids and has a relatively long half life of approximately 17 hours. Therefore, the detection of cotinine is less dependent on the time of sampling than that of nicotine and other metabolites. Cotinine has been widely used as a biomarker of tobacco exposure. Methods of analysis for cotinine in biological fluids include gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, HPLC, HPLC-mass spectrometry, EIA and RIA. These methods usually require special equipment and complicated operation procedures. The Smoke Check Test is a one step immunoassay that is used for the qualitative detection of cotinine in human urine. It is based on the principle of highly specific immunochemical reactions of antigens and antibodies. It is a simple and convenient test for the rapid qualitative detection of cotinine in human urine at 200 ng/ml cut-off concentration. http://www.xpressdrugtest.com/smokeCheck.html Typical drug detection/clearance times for a chronic smoker 7-14days http://www.craigmedical.com/drug_test_faq.htm

Response:

"Kita" We now know that the component of a drug of abuse that we get addicted to is the metabolite of the drug, not the drug itself.

Of course we do Dear… Now go to sleep!!!

Response:

"Kita" We now know that the component of a drug of abuse that we get addicted to is the metabolite of the drug, not the drug itself. Of course we do Dear… Now go to sleep!!!

LOL Sorry, I’m up for the day, 18 more hours of pharmacokinetic lectures on cotinine and nicotine if you want.. you ready? :P :)

Response:

Typical drug detection/clearance times for a chronic smoker 7-14days http://www.craigmedical.com/drug_test_faq.htm

THANKS kita! i have always believed that clearance is more than 72 hours, and i think as studies continue  they  will find that its longer than the 7-14 days too! there is alot to be discovered about the bodies ability "to store" chemicals! rosie

Response:

PLEASE tell me this isn’t true!

It isn’t true!

Response:

i have always believed that clearance is more than 72 hours, and i think as studies continue  they  will find that its longer than the 7-14 days too!

Oh the two are not incompatible….. Your body would be clear of all adverse (and positive) effects of cannabis after a few hours. No cognitive test would be able to detect it’s presence. But a urine test would show positive for about a month. One of the arguments advanced against the use of mandatory drug testing in UK prisons was this very fact. Heroin is un detectable after 3 days. The argument suggested that the introduction of this testing would encourage the use of harder drugs in our prisons, due to the much reduced chances of being caught. This has since proven to be the case. steveb

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? *hugs* *confused about the content of pee* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com

Good grief.  Wouldn’t it be easier to just sniff you? Kim 10M

Response:

Never heard of this, Maddie. FWIW, any quit method that is keeping you from sticking cigarettes in your mouth is a method that is working.  Don’t worry about the minute detail as that can be dealt with later.  Whatever it is that you are doing today is way healthier than what you were doing a week ago, and your ability to do even more healthy things for yourself will grow with each passing day. Just don’t stick a cigarette in your mouth.  That is all you have to do. hugs, elle — "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." -James Branch Cabell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Someone (I’ll google him if you insist on sources) over at alt.quit.smoking.support said this: "I’ve heard, can’t verify it, but have heard, that nicotine, being fat soluble, hides in fat cells when you smoke; your body stores it; and that when you quit, after your body goes through some withdrawal, the stored nicotine is released and agitates you all over again.  Seems like a reasonable explanation." PLEASE tell me this isn’t true! If it is, my entire quit method goes out the effin’ window! Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I thought the nicotine was stored in your bladder.  Otherwise, why have I got to pee in a cup to prove I get non-smoker’s rates now on my life insurance????? *hugs* *confused about the content of pee* —    BinnieBee –  A Proud Old Fogie!        %%      (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://www.cyberdigs.com Good grief.  Wouldn’t it be easier to just sniff you? Kim 10M

ROFLMAO!!!  It gets MY vote, Kim! :^D *hugs* —    BinnieBee – A Proud Old Fogie!         %%       (—-)      ( __< )      ^^ ~~ ^^      ~f3as3~ Quit since 11/01/2001 http://binniebee.com http://cyberdigs.com

Response:

"BinnieBee"  wrote Good grief.  Wouldn’t it be easier to just sniff you? ROFLMAO!!!  It gets MY vote, Kim! :^D

Remember how when we smoked we fooled ourselves into thinking that we could disguise that fact, or hide it from others, by chewing a piece of gum, or spritzing on some after shave or perfume? Like it was going to magically hide our years-long indulgence in inhaling poisonous gasses, and strip the disgusting, lingering odor out of our skin, hair, clothing, etc…? I went to the doctor a while ago, and was delighted to answer "no"–and to inform her that it’d been over 3 years since I quit– when she asked if I was a smoker. A moment later, it sank in, and I felt like blurting out "What? You mean you couldn’t just *sniff* me and tell that…? Come on!"

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – JoeD: … So now I am curious, tell us about your quit method, and why this idea would throw it out the effin’ window? … Well, JoeD, you old fogey plus, my quit is sorta centered on the idea that nicotine withdrawal is the tenth, and least-publicized, circle of Hell. Quitting cold turkey is *supposed* to be the quickest and more painful way of getting oneself off of the nicotine. My plan is two-fold. First, off of nicotine the fastest possible way. Second, stock up on unpleasant experiences whilst withdrawing from nicotine so as to deter me from ever smoking again (which would make me want to quit again which would make me have to withdraw again). So, if I have little nicotine time bombs hidden in my fat globules just waiting to screw with me…ah, f_ck it all. Maddie, non-smoker since March 25, 2003 [I'm doing it, even if I'm not liking it (-_-)]

hey Maddie, I did not read all the responses to your question here – but I don’t buy this ‘nicotine time bombs hidden in fat globules’ theory at all!  I quit cold turkey – and I did not cheat, not once.  And plenty of other people here quit cold turkey too!  And yes, it was hell for a *relatively short time!!*, but it was doable.  I survived anyway – and I am not some tuff guy either.  Give me a tight pair of shoes and I am gonna wail.  You can do this Maddie – nicotine globules or not..!! -JoeD nicotine time bombs hidden in fat globules  <– a line I must remember!

Response:

Ya Maddie!  I agree with Joe. I think this theory about stuff hiding in fat cells is being stretched a little too far. (Hmmm- but I have mysteriously gained a few pounds since my quit.)  It’s a convenient explanation why you might feel a crave 6 months to a year down the road, but I seriously doubt that it’s anything more than amusing. I’m a cold-turkey quitter also, although I have quit with NRT lots of times!!!    :-) Besides, are you going to worry about the miniscule particles of matter (that might not even be there), or the clouds of smoke that you would inhale daily??? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – -JoeD nicotine time bombs hidden in fat globules

Response:

A Rational Proposal

Question:

Hey Neuro, don’t go away mad!  I’m sure that there are alot of people here that support your position.  You just gotta realize that for the most part a lot of us are still just trying to figure out how to get through each day without snapping at our loved ones, eating a pail of ice cream, forgetting to unplug the clothes iron *again*, and not putting a cigarette in our mouths and lighting it.  Give people a break and there’s a good chance you’ll get one in return. Jo qof

Damn fine reply Jo.  That’s it in a nutshell. Kim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Okay then, never mind, looks like I picked a poor place to find any manner of support, oddly enough, suggesting that the gov’t use all those tax dollars to fund a nicotine treatment program to get existing smokers to quit, in a stop smoking newsgroup, appears to be unwanted for someodd reason… As for the other detractors, if you read the whole thing through, you might notice that I gave my case as an EXAMPLE… I’m very sure I’m not the only person who finds cigarettes in many ways cheaper than the alternatives… And politically motivated? You bet! Since tobacco was first taxed, the US gov’t has been making at least as much as the tobacco industry, in essense profiting from the deaths of it’s citizenry… And additionally, nicotine alternatives being priced as they are is politically motivated as well… Do you reeeeallly think a bit of nicotine in a chewing gum base should cost close to 65-75 cents apiece? As for the matter of discipline, not everyone has a level of discipline nessesary to go cold turkey flat out, that’s why as so many have noticed, that only 35-45% of those who quit outright actually keep away from cigarettes… And every year hundreds of thousands of kids get hooked as well, suggesting that KIDS have an equally high level of discipline is ridiculous… Nicotine is an extremely addictive substance, so much so that it ranks up there with heroin and cocaine (as mentioned before, if one gets hooked on those, there’s a plethora of available free, government funded treatment programs)… As for the cigar and pipesmoking ads, I saw one anti cigar ad back in 1996, and nothing since… The cigar spot was only shown once… All that’s been shown on the air recently, are those amazingly obnoxious truth spots… Now on the other hand, why so many here who have had to quit smoking themselves are reluctant to help others, or even recognise that the government should take some responsibility for deliberately poisoning their constituancy, that is a real mystery… It seems many who quit smoking are attempting to absolve themselves of as much responsibility for supporting that very system…

Response:

Here was the rationale when I quit (and quite rational, I think): Cost of a week of cigarettes (two years ago) $23.45 Cost of a week of the patch (two years ago) $25.00 When using the patch, do NOT buy cigarettes. You have quit smoking. $1.55 more per week to quit? I, too, am a starving artist, and was able to swing it. In addition, after the 10 weeks of the patch were through… I WASN’T SPENDING ANYTHING!!!!!!! MaryO dof — now have NOT spent $3,217.00 on smokes It adds up, and it’s rational. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi all, my name is Brian, I’m a quitting smoker, been off the stick for about 3 weeks now… (insert "Hi Brian!" here) Anyhoo, I’ve been thinking about the whole quitting thing, actually, had to think about it each time I ran out of nicotine gum and was "forced" by cost to return to smoking… Which is what brought me to one serious question: Why is it so expensive to quit smoking (other than going cold turkey)? You see, I’m a self employed artist… Or "starving artist" to the layman… When I started smoking, it was in the early 90s, back when smoking was still fashionable… Being the cost was so high, I started with handrolled cigarettes (which on average cost about 1/3 to 1/2 the price of prerolled premium cigarettes)… As such, my smoking costs were approximately $12 a week total, at the most… While it takes slightly more effort to afford the gum to quit, the fact that the anti smoking movement has been using the "It’s cheaper to use gum or patches to quit!" argument brought some serious concerns to mind… In a lot of ways, isn’t the mainstreamed anti smoking movement in fact another class war? After all, I don’t recall seeing ads in press or on TV decrying the evils of cigar smokers or pipe smokers (same drug, different delivery, right?)… And cigarettes, for all their evils, were a drug introduced that could be undertaken by both poor AND rich alike, correct? After all, if you have a dollar in your pocket, you can get a cheap pack of Bugler, and at least 7 out of 10 poverty class adults are smokers, if not chewing tobacco users… So what is my point, you are most definately asking… My point is, other than those who can afford nicotine alternatives, the poor are being largely left behind in having a simple solution to their addiction… These are people who will largely be left behind to live the last of their otherwise productive days on a ventilation machine, consuming hundreds of thousands of healthcare dollars… And why? Because the taxes they paid on their tobacco went into paying off lawyers, and subsidising pork barrel programs that are completely unrelated to smokers or smoker rehabilitation… These are people who are addicted to an otherwise completely LEGAL drug, who would have had no problems finding rehabilitation if they were doing an illegal drug such as cocaine or heroin… The government has been collecting upwards of 25% of taxes on tobacco products for time immemorial (and then there’s the recent taxes in New York, almost 100% on the dollar)… And YET, as much as quitting smoking is promoted, not ONE governmental organization is willing to return the tax dollars paid on tobacco towards helping people to quit… Simple logic: It costs at the MOST, $700 to help someone to quit smoking without going cold turkey (most who have gone cold turkey can attest that not everybody could do such easily, let alone keep a job or maintain some level of civility)… It costs at LEAST $700,000 in health care to keep someone alive who DOESN’T quit smoking… Each smoker contributes approximately $720 a year on average in tax dollars, with a .5% average (of course it can be higher or lower, but the number is around there)… In the case of a smoker who’s been smoking for 10 years, that comes to $7,200… In other words, for every smoker who’s been smoking for 10 years, you can cure 10 smokers within 6 months… Basically, it’s time to take a good hard look at this situation… Should the money that we die, essentially in giving, go to pay the government and lawyers, who were the first to PROFIT from it, or should we use those tax dollars to prevent others from becoming addicted, and to help stop existing addicts from dying, just to keep the fat cats rolling in money?

Response:

Okay then, never mind, looks like I picked a poor place to find any manner of support, oddly enough, suggesting that the gov’t use all those tax dollars to fund a nicotine treatment program to get existing smokers to quit, in a stop smoking newsgroup, appears to be unwanted for someodd reason…

If you are looking for support in quitting smoking, you are in the right place.  If you are looking for support in bringing down RJR/BT/whoever, then sure, there are people who are into blaming their addiction on the tobacco companies/tax-hungry government, but that doesn’t help most of us (IMNSHO).  I believe my addiction is mine. Nobody else gave it to me – I bought and paid for it, and only by accepting responsibility for it can I finally defeat it. Good luck to you and your quit, whatever works for you is good. — Lemming Curiosity *may* have killed Schr

What is so great about ZYBAN???????

Question:

Yeah, I couldn’t agree more. I used a patch on the 1st day just cause I was scared to try it cold turkey. Like I said, I was a 2 1/2 to 3 pack a day smoker. The 2nd day I tried it cold turkey and was amazed by the lack of serious withdrawl symptoms I experienced (I think I may have even smiled that day lol) I have been cold turkey ever since, which may not seem like alot compared to some of the people who have months or even years under their belts, but it is a MIRACLE for me. And I really want to stress that there is no right way or wrong way to quit. What works for one person may not work for another. I think it’s just important to read everyone’s experience to see what works for each and every successful quitter. And then use their experiences to help you make a successful quit. I had a MAJOR problem here today and I am so very DAMN proud of myself for not caving in that I can’t even put it into words. I really wish all the wonderful people in here (even the ones who are trying to start a flame war LOL)  good luck in their quit.  Bruce D. PS BTW has anyone heard from Bruce M? We quit at the same time and I have not heard from him in a while. If your there Bruce, Please don’t quit quitting. We are all behind you and we are here if you decide you need our assistance. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Right, Bruce.  Zyban/Wellbutrin is an anti-depressant, not an anti-psychotic. BTW, I used Zyban and gum to quit.  Zyban really seemed to help, but it wasn’t, like, a miracle or anything.  If you can take it, if you don’t have negative side-effects or whatever, I recommend it. ep  dof No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Right, Bruce.  Zyban/Wellbutrin is an anti-depressant, not an anti-psychotic. BTW, I used Zyban and gum to quit.  Zyban really seemed to help, but it wasn’t, like, a miracle or anything.  If you can take it, if you don’t have negative side-effects or whatever, I recommend it. ep  dof

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Yeah, My wife is a nurse and every time I get put on a new drug I look it up in her Mosley’s Medicine book. I REALLY don’t trust Doctors or the pharmacists to get all my questions right. I have heard WAY too many problems (even deaths) from drug interactions. My wifey tells me I’m paranoid but it never hurts to be informed about the drugs your ingesting is my opinion. I even compare the pill with the picture if they have one cause the druggist is a human too and we’re all capable of making mistakes. I do have a concern that I think makes alot of sense. I live in the US and I don’t know how they do it in the UK but when a Doctor writes a ’scrip here, it is COMPLETLEY unreadable. I mean it is just scribbles. With all the new technology we have, it seems like there could be a better, safer way to get the info to the pharamist. With all the new drugs coming out that have VERY dangerous counter affects, it seems stupid for these supposedly educated professional people who write like 2 year olds and the druggist having to guess (or presume) what drug they are trying to fill. OK, thats my rant for the day (or 2 lol) Bruce D.   I have not smoked for: 3 weeks, 3 days, 20 hours, 41 minutes and 59 seconds.  1,367 cigarettes not smoked, $273.48 saved, life saved 4D 17:57:11. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was wondering about that, Bruce.  Because I take it and have never been psychotic.  My doctor prescribed it originally for smoking cessation and then subsequently when she tried to prescribe an antidepressant for my getting-to-be-old-lady-crap I asked if we could just re-do the Wellbutrin since I had no adverse effects from it before (& my new insurance won’t pay for it as a smoking cessation aid, which is so friggin’ ridiculous, but that’s another story…).  So, anyway, I am taking it now for both purposes. But nobody but an ex-husband has ever accused me of being psychotic!  (I haven’t actually heard him do it, but when I was married to him he had been married twice previously and both, coincidentally enough, were "psycho bitches", so I assume I am, too, now. ;^) BinnieBee Psycho Bitch #3 Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Hey Incndnz…you should do a little research on zyban if you’re really interested.  Their website is www.zyban.com.  I just got off zyban and the only side effects were:  spaciness in the first few days (but this was strongest during first few days quit, so it could have been DTs), difficulty sleeping in the second or third week (not really difficulty, just sleeping very lightly), and an amazing ability to quit smoking.  Maybe it was placebo effect, but whatever…I’m not smoking, that’s all that matters. Amber 2M 1W  17H  26M  24S

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was wondering about that, Bruce.  Because I take it and have never been psychotic.  My doctor prescribed it originally for smoking cessation and then subsequently when she tried to prescribe an antidepressant for my getting-to-be-old-lady-crap I asked if we could just re-do the Wellbutrin since I had no adverse effects from it before (& my new insurance won’t pay for it as a smoking cessation aid, which is so friggin’ ridiculous, but that’s another story…).  So, anyway, I am taking it now for both purposes. But nobody but an ex-husband has ever accused me of being psychotic!  (I haven’t actually heard him do it, but when I was married to him he had been married twice previously and both, coincidentally enough, were "psycho bitches", so I assume I am, too, now. ;^) BinnieBee Psycho Bitch #3

Now THAT’s funny.  "you" are psycho, but he’s normal, probably the only normal one out there, right? *LOL* Another funny thing about smoking, etc, is that if you were a heroin addict, the state would provide you  with needles, methadone, etc to get you "off the junk".  Try getting a light from a public servant!!!  I don’t know where you hang your hat, but that’s how it is here in Canada.  Smokers: Fend for yourselves, Junkies, you are victims of society.  Here, have a needle.  Makes me want to PUKE!!!!! Anyway, enough ranting!  So far, David Garvin has gone One month, three weeks, one day, 18 hours, 20 minutes and 51 seconds without a smoke.  That means 1344 cigarettes not smoked, saving $376.35. I should now live an extra 4 days, 16 hours, 0 minutes. Congratulate me on ICQ at 146787444 PS: I too am "psycho", but it was an ex girlfriend, not ex wife =-

Response:

I was wondering about that, Bruce.  Because I take it and have never been psychotic.  My doctor prescribed it originally for smoking cessation and then subsequently when she tried to prescribe an antidepressant for my getting-to-be-old-lady-crap I asked if we could just re-do the Wellbutrin since I had no adverse effects from it before (& my new insurance won’t pay for it as a smoking cessation aid, which is so friggin’ ridiculous, but that’s another story…).  So, anyway, I am taking it now for both purposes. But nobody but an ex-husband has ever accused me of being psychotic!  (I haven’t actually heard him do it, but when I was married to him he had been married twice previously and both, coincidentally enough, were "psycho bitches", so I assume I am, too, now. ;^) BinnieBee Psycho Bitch #3

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

I am taking zyban and the biggest side effect is the cost. Insurance does not cover stop smoking aids but will cover lung cancer. I think I had depression and didn’t know it but I think I would go crazy without the zyban. I am also doing the inhaler cause I hate gum and the patch would have broken me out since everything does even kiddie bandages. the only side effect that I have seen is the first three or four days you get really woozy. Try to take it when you don’t have to go anywhere. You have to take it for a week before you quit. I wish I would have waited two weeks but I wanted to quit. It doesn’t make you sick to smoke and take the pill but I noticed that I didn’t want to smoke as much when I first started to take it. I also quit snacking all of the time, this is the reason that the doctor thinks I could have been depressed. I know it cost money but I think that it is a good idea for everyone to get a check up BEFORE they quit. There are some people that can NOT take it and this is when it pays to be honest with your doctor. Best of luck, Amylee. 412 cigarettes not smoked, saving $41.23. NRT replacement so far, $102.85.

Response:

well, here’s the way i see it… i took zyban… i quit smoking… i think that’s pretty great!!! Amber 2M 6D  19H  28M  49S

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m real curious to know, why it is sooooo great?

Response:

Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

Response:

For some people, Zyban is a miracle cure in that it causes them to lose their desire to smoke.  For many others, (including me) it’s a good anti-depressant (which is usefull when quitting) but doesn’t have the desire killing effect. All I can say is that I used both the patch and zyban and I quit!  As in all things, YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary) Bob C VOF To reply, remove "nojunk"

Response:

I’m real curious to know, why it is sooooo great?

Response:

I’m real curious to know, why it is sooooo great?

I’m no doctor or scientist, but it affects the part of your brain that causes or feeds the addictions.  It was used for cocaine addicts and then found that it really was a great aid to any addict to help in fighting addictions. It isn’t "so great" for a lot of people.  Anyone that is prone to, or has ever had seizures is advised not to use it.  Other than that, it has seemed to be relatively safe.  It causes some side effects for some ppl that they cannot tolerate, and for the mass majority of us it causes some mild side effects only for the first few days.  I have quit many times using it.  I have gotten off of it too soon before (as in before 2 mos after quitting) and could tell a HUGE difference in my cravings, even though I was off all nicotine and had been for several weeks. It’s definitely worth looking into.  I have used it the last 4 years to quit smoking.  No denying that it helps, but it’s not a miracle drug that is going to make you stop smoking with no pain.  Nothing can do that.  And until you get your mind into the right gear nothing in the world will help you quit.  Mine’s in the right gear this year.   And I’m only taking 1/2 dose of Wellbutrin/Zyban.  So side effects are nonexistent for me yet it is still helping. —    BinnieBee       &&&&          (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~

Response:

I’m real curious to know, why it is sooooo great?

Response:

I’m real curious to know, why it is sooooo great?

I’m no doctor or scientist, but it affects the part of your brain that causes or feeds the addictions.  It was used for cocaine addicts and then found that it really was a great aid to any addict to help in fighting addictions. It isn’t "so great" for a lot of people.  Anyone that is prone to, or has ever had seizures is advised not to use it.  Other than that, it has seemed to be relatively safe.  It causes some side effects for some ppl that they cannot tolerate, and for the mass majority of us it causes some mild side effects only for the first few days.  I have quit many times using it.  I have gotten off of it too soon before (as in before 2 mos after quitting) and could tell a HUGE difference in my cravings, even though I was off all nicotine and had been for several weeks. It’s definitely worth looking into.  I have used it the last 4 years to quit smoking.  No denying that it helps, but it’s not a miracle drug that is going to make you stop smoking with no pain.  Nothing can do that.  And until you get your mind into the right gear nothing in the world will help you quit.  Mine’s in the right gear this year.   And I’m only taking 1/2 dose of Wellbutrin/Zyban.  So side effects are nonexistent for me yet it is still helping. —    BinnieBee       &&&&          (—-)     ( __< )     ^^ ~~ ^^     ~f3as3~

Response:

For some people, Zyban is a miracle cure in that it causes them to lose their desire to smoke.  For many others, (including me) it’s a good anti-depressant (which is usefull when quitting) but doesn’t have the desire killing effect. All I can say is that I used both the patch and zyban and I quit!  As in all things, YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary) Bob C VOF To reply, remove "nojunk"

Response:

well, here’s the way i see it… i took zyban… i quit smoking… i think that’s pretty great!!! Amber 2M 6D  19H  28M  49S

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m real curious to know, why it is sooooo great?

Response:

Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

Response:

Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

I am taking zyban and the biggest side effect is the cost. Insurance does not cover stop smoking aids but will cover lung cancer. I think I had depression and didn’t know it but I think I would go crazy without the zyban. I am also doing the inhaler cause I hate gum and the patch would have broken me out since everything does even kiddie bandages. the only side effect that I have seen is the first three or four days you get really woozy. Try to take it when you don’t have to go anywhere. You have to take it for a week before you quit. I wish I would have waited two weeks but I wanted to quit. It doesn’t make you sick to smoke and take the pill but I noticed that I didn’t want to smoke as much when I first started to take it. I also quit snacking all of the time, this is the reason that the doctor thinks I could have been depressed. I know it cost money but I think that it is a good idea for everyone to get a check up BEFORE they quit. There are some people that can NOT take it and this is when it pays to be honest with your doctor. Best of luck, Amylee. 412 cigarettes not smoked, saving $41.23. NRT replacement so far, $102.85.

Response:

Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

I was wondering about that, Bruce.  Because I take it and have never been psychotic.  My doctor prescribed it originally for smoking cessation and then subsequently when she tried to prescribe an antidepressant for my getting-to-be-old-lady-crap I asked if we could just re-do the Wellbutrin since I had no adverse effects from it before (& my new insurance won’t pay for it as a smoking cessation aid, which is so friggin’ ridiculous, but that’s another story…).  So, anyway, I am taking it now for both purposes. But nobody but an ex-husband has ever accused me of being psychotic!  (I haven’t actually heard him do it, but when I was married to him he had been married twice previously and both, coincidentally enough, were "psycho bitches", so I assume I am, too, now. ;^) BinnieBee Psycho Bitch #3

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was wondering about that, Bruce.  Because I take it and have never been psychotic.  My doctor prescribed it originally for smoking cessation and then subsequently when she tried to prescribe an antidepressant for my getting-to-be-old-lady-crap I asked if we could just re-do the Wellbutrin since I had no adverse effects from it before (& my new insurance won’t pay for it as a smoking cessation aid, which is so friggin’ ridiculous, but that’s another story…).  So, anyway, I am taking it now for both purposes. But nobody but an ex-husband has ever accused me of being psychotic!  (I haven’t actually heard him do it, but when I was married to him he had been married twice previously and both, coincidentally enough, were "psycho bitches", so I assume I am, too, now. ;^) BinnieBee Psycho Bitch #3

Now THAT’s funny.  "you" are psycho, but he’s normal, probably the only normal one out there, right? *LOL* Another funny thing about smoking, etc, is that if you were a heroin addict, the state would provide you  with needles, methadone, etc to get you "off the junk".  Try getting a light from a public servant!!!  I don’t know where you hang your hat, but that’s how it is here in Canada.  Smokers: Fend for yourselves, Junkies, you are victims of society.  Here, have a needle.  Makes me want to PUKE!!!!! Anyway, enough ranting!  So far, David Garvin has gone One month, three weeks, one day, 18 hours, 20 minutes and 51 seconds without a smoke.  That means 1344 cigarettes not smoked, saving $376.35. I should now live an extra 4 days, 16 hours, 0 minutes. Congratulate me on ICQ at 146787444 PS: I too am "psycho", but it was an ex girlfriend, not ex wife =-

Response:

Hey Incndnz…you should do a little research on zyban if you’re really interested.  Their website is www.zyban.com.  I just got off zyban and the only side effects were:  spaciness in the first few days (but this was strongest during first few days quit, so it could have been DTs), difficulty sleeping in the second or third week (not really difficulty, just sleeping very lightly), and an amazing ability to quit smoking.  Maybe it was placebo effect, but whatever…I’m not smoking, that’s all that matters. Amber 2M 1W  17H  26M  24S

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz

Response:

Right, Bruce.  Zyban/Wellbutrin is an anti-depressant, not an anti-psychotic. BTW, I used Zyban and gum to quit.  Zyban really seemed to help, but it wasn’t, like, a miracle or anything.  If you can take it, if you don’t have negative side-effects or whatever, I recommend it. ep  dof

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Yeah, My wife is a nurse and every time I get put on a new drug I look it up in her Mosley’s Medicine book. I REALLY don’t trust Doctors or the pharmacists to get all my questions right. I have heard WAY too many problems (even deaths) from drug interactions. My wifey tells me I’m paranoid but it never hurts to be informed about the drugs your ingesting is my opinion. I even compare the pill with the picture if they have one cause the druggist is a human too and we’re all capable of making mistakes. I do have a concern that I think makes alot of sense. I live in the US and I don’t know how they do it in the UK but when a Doctor writes a ’scrip here, it is COMPLETLEY unreadable. I mean it is just scribbles. With all the new technology we have, it seems like there could be a better, safer way to get the info to the pharamist. With all the new drugs coming out that have VERY dangerous counter affects, it seems stupid for these supposedly educated professional people who write like 2 year olds and the druggist having to guess (or presume) what drug they are trying to fill. OK, thats my rant for the day (or 2 lol) Bruce D.   I have not smoked for: 3 weeks, 3 days, 20 hours, 41 minutes and 59 seconds.  1,367 cigarettes not smoked, $273.48 saved, life saved 4D 17:57:11. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was wondering about that, Bruce.  Because I take it and have never been psychotic.  My doctor prescribed it originally for smoking cessation and then subsequently when she tried to prescribe an antidepressant for my getting-to-be-old-lady-crap I asked if we could just re-do the Wellbutrin since I had no adverse effects from it before (& my new insurance won’t pay for it as a smoking cessation aid, which is so friggin’ ridiculous, but that’s another story…).  So, anyway, I am taking it now for both purposes. But nobody but an ex-husband has ever accused me of being psychotic!  (I haven’t actually heard him do it, but when I was married to him he had been married twice previously and both, coincidentally enough, were "psycho bitches", so I assume I am, too, now. ;^) BinnieBee Psycho Bitch #3 Technically zyban/wellbutrin (same thing, different brand name) was originally used as an anti-psyhotic.  As I’m sure you can guess, part of being a really real "psychotic" is having the urge to do something society in general finds in poor taste, nasty or harmful.  So, once they figured out that this drug reduced the ‘cravings’ of psychotic to do strange things, they tried it on coke addicts, et cetera. What I want to know is, what are the side effect? i’m seriously considering trying it out… Incndnz No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Yeah, I couldn’t agree more. I used a patch on the 1st day just cause I was scared to try it cold turkey. Like I said, I was a 2 1/2 to 3 pack a day smoker. The 2nd day I tried it cold turkey and was amazed by the lack of serious withdrawl symptoms I experienced (I think I may have even smiled that day lol) I have been cold turkey ever since, which may not seem like alot compared to some of the people who have months or even years under their belts, but it is a MIRACLE for me. And I really want to stress that there is no right way or wrong way to quit. What works for one person may not work for another. I think it’s just important to read everyone’s experience to see what works for each and every successful quitter. And then use their experiences to help you make a successful quit. I had a MAJOR problem here today and I am so very DAMN proud of myself for not caving in that I can’t even put it into words. I really wish all the wonderful people in here (even the ones who are trying to start a flame war LOL)  good luck in their quit.  Bruce D. PS BTW has anyone heard from Bruce M? We quit at the same time and I have not heard from him in a while. If your there Bruce, Please don’t quit quitting. We are all behind you and we are here if you decide you need our assistance. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Right, Bruce.  Zyban/Wellbutrin is an anti-depressant, not an anti-psychotic. BTW, I used Zyban and gum to quit.  Zyban really seemed to help, but it wasn’t, like, a miracle or anything.  If you can take it, if you don’t have negative side-effects or whatever, I recommend it. ep  dof No, Wellbutrin is an anti-depressent. Totally different than a anti-physcotic. It generally was prescribed for people with depression not other mental diseases, Bruce D.

Response:

Today is the day.

Question:

been there… done that… never again… when ya think about doing any of those again, remember that night… works for me! good luck to ya mate – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – 2 or 3 cigarettes and didn’t really enjoy any of them.  The gum is really helping.  I think I may have overdosed this weekend, though.  I was chewing the gum, I had too much to drink (I drink alcohol once a year, at most, so my tolerance is VERY low), I was talked into some chronic (another once-per-year-or-so indulgence), and then I smoked a cigarrette.  I found myself in the bathroom puking for two hours and I seriously thought "I am going to die".  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Response:

Tough way to learn that lesson Eric! But glad you did… Nothing worse than spending your night in the bathroom thinking that dying would actually be preferable to what you are going through… Post when you need to…we’ll be here Paula

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – 2 or 3 cigarettes and didn’t really enjoy any of them.  The gum is really helping.  I think I may have overdosed this weekend, though.  I was chewing the gum, I had too much to drink (I drink alcohol once a year, at most, so my tolerance is VERY low), I was talked into some chronic (another once-per-year-or-so indulgence), and then I smoked a cigarrette.  I found myself in the bathroom puking for two hours and I seriously thought "I am going to die".  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Response:

2 or 3 cigarettes and didn’t really enjoy any of them.  The gum is really helping.  I think I may have overdosed this weekend, though.  I was chewing the gum, I had too much to drink (I drink alcohol once a year, at most, so my tolerance is VERY low), I was talked into some chronic (another once-per-year-or-so indulgence), and then I smoked a cigarrette.  I found myself in the bathroom puking for two hours and I seriously thought "I am going to die".  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Response:

.  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Ya really gotta watch those little slip ups they can be killers (GRIN) as long as we learn fro our mistakes we will do better next time…. dont give up get back into ur quitting mode and hang in there]] Feequin

Response:

Eric: Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.

All right! Congratulations on your decision to quit :) … There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.

Yes, I romanticized and glamorized sickarettes a lot, too, before I quit. After you get some smober time under your belt, I’ll bet you’ll view this particular ritual a bit differently. … I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.

Eeek…I think steveb already mentioned this, but you aren’t supposed to use the nicotine gum while you are still smoking! You can overdose on nicotine that way (not a pretty thing at all). … When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.

… Where in the hell did this doctor train? Quack University? That’s absolutely not true! For instance, just one cigarette destroy the cilia in your lungs and it can take up to *nine* *months* for them to regrow. Also, if you don’t quit now, there’s no guarantee you would stay at your current consumption of cigarettes. I believe I read that the longer you smoke, the more you smoke…or it becomes a possibility, anyway. Good luck with your quit, Eric. What works for me (and a lot of quitters) is coming here daily. —– Maddie, 5 months

Response:

Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh…

Nah indeed …. I doubled my caffiene intake (at least). Do what feels right for you. Welcome aboard, you just made a great decision. A few points to consider tho. The use of NRT while still smoking is against all the advice on the leaflet, and just isn’t worth doing. Besides the risk of overdose, adding to the regular nicotine intake just prior to a quit doesn’t seem logical! Basically, if you are still smoking, you shouldn’t be using Nicotine REPLACEMENT Therapy! NRT in most forms isn’t reccomended anyway for those who smoke 10 cigs a day or less. The possible exception to this would be Gum, but use it sparingly if you can, or you may actually increase the amount of nicotine, over what you had as a smoker. No biggie, just takes longer to get off it is all. Your doctor was wrong! Good luck with your quit, read and post here often. Grab a meter and watch it grow. steveb

Response:

Good for you Eric! Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.

You’re an addict as much as the person who smokes three packs a day. The number of cigs really doesn’t matter…the same way someone who has one drink a day is as much an alcoholic as the guy who only binge drinks once a week…   There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.

Give yourself some time to change that mindset. Because it will change. I was a happy smoker for quite some time, and only quit at first because I thought I should. Now…I truly do understand what a nasty and destructive habit it was…   When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen.

What a pile of bullshit. Just one cigarette will do you damage. How do you know that "one" you smoke is not the one that will cause a cell in your body to mutate and eventually become cancer? I would bet that your doctor is either a smoker, or an ex smoker. You say you were surprised to hear that – I am completely aghast. Please…don’t use his false advice as a reason to blow your quit. I can give you the names of 20 other doctors who will totally disagree with him. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh…

Nah! Just be aware though, that if caffeine is a huge trigger (it was for me) to be careful and make sure you have the gum with you. Also, I drank a LOT of coffee and found that replacing every second cup with a herbal tea made me much less anxious and hyper… Best wishes to you! Post often…we love to hear how newbies are getting on! Paula

Response:

Wise choice Eric on deciding to quit the butts.  You know the old saying,"1 is to many….100 is not enough".  As for what the doctor said, that is crap!!!  I can’t believe a doc would tell you that, but then he probably hacks the butts to.  Just go with your plan to quit and your body will love you for it.  Stick with the gum because it will help.  Good luck and come here often, it helps. stever 9M+

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.  There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.  I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.  I must say that tingling sensation from the gum is quite pleasant…if it wasn’t so outrageously expensive I might get addicted to that. When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh… Eric

Response:

Keep the caffeine Eric… at least for now. And don’t romanticize that late night smoke too much.  It may have felt nice, but you can indeed get along without it and maybe even find something else just as wonderful to enjoy. If the addiction isn’t so hard to break, be aware of how hard it may be to break the habit.  It might take some major reconditioning to get past the emptiness that use to be called routine.  I hope you have been reading and picking up tips on how to deal with those battles. www.quitbuddies.org http://www.bluethunder.org/quitterhome.html You post tugged at me just a bit. You see, my youngest son is turning "the tender age of 13" on Monday.  I sure hope he doesn’t make the same mistake you did.. the same mistake i did… his dad.. his grandmothers…  <sigh ~August OF+

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.  There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.  I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.  I must say that tingling sensation from the gum is quite pleasant…if it wasn’t so outrageously expensive I might get addicted to that. When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh… Eric

Response:

Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.  There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.  I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.  I must say that tingling sensation from the gum is quite pleasant…if it wasn’t so outrageously expensive I might get addicted to that. When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh… Eric

Response:

Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Good shooting !!   I’m in the same boat….  cigs & drinks Best O’ luck 15 hours, 25 minutes and 48 seconds. 19 cigarettes not smoked, saving $4.82. Life saved: 1 hour, 35 minutes. — Facta Non Verba

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

I dunno Austin, I think I would do one at a time. The cravings from smoking withdrawal are bad enough to endure. I can’t imagine both at the same time. I’ve heard of people who have but most of them woke up that way in an I.C.U. BTW, Welcome -Tom

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Thanks, By the way what is the translation of "Facta Non Verba"? just curiours.. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Good shooting !!   I’m in the same boat….  cigs & drinks Best O’ luck 15 hours, 25 minutes and 48 seconds. 19 cigarettes not smoked, saving $4.82. Life saved: 1 hour, 35 minutes. — Facta Non Verba Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

 The logic is that my cigarette cravings are greatly intensified when I’m drinking, also when I’m drinking I dont think as clearly as I do when I’m not and would be more likely to self justify having "Just one smoke". So the way I see it, both habits have to go a once. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I dunno Austin, I think I would do one at a time. The cravings from smoking withdrawal are bad enough to endure. I can’t imagine both at the same time. I’ve heard of people who have but most of them woke up that way in an I.C.U. BTW, Welcome -Tom Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Post all you want.  And when the going gets tough….post some more!! Good to have you here. Chris 2weeks 1day – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm. This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Good for you Austin.  I hope you have some help from Zyban, or other nicotine replacement therapy. i.e. nicotine gum or patches.  Cold turkey from two packs a day is tough without some help.  Post here often and read the stories of those who have gone before you; I find that they strengthen my resolve. Cheers, Bruce – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

And I would like to add to Bruce’s comment.  I have a friend that drinks way too much.  She feels bad about it and has tried to cut back or quit a few times.  She has told me that she finds Welbutrin (Zyban), which was prescribed for mild depression, to drastically cut down on her alcohol intake.  What Wellbutrin or Zyban originally did for Cocaine addicts, and is now doing for nicotine addicts apparently also helps alcohol addicts.  So, I second Bruce’s thought that if you are not on Zyban or Wellbutrin, you might think seriously about calling your doctor tomorrow for a prescription. BinnieBee Three weeks, three days, 17 hours, 38 minutes and 37 seconds. 742 cigarettes not smoked, saving $122.07. Life saved: 2 days, 13 hours, 50 minutes.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Good for you Austin.  I hope you have some help from Zyban, or other nicotine replacement therapy. i.e. nicotine gum or patches.  Cold turkey from two packs a day is tough without some help.  Post here often and read the stories of those who have gone before you; I find that they strengthen my resolve. Cheers, Bruce Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

In alt.support.stop-smoking, on 26 Nov 2001, Austin House announced: …I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like.

Congratulations on quitting Austin. Definately feel free to post your progress and let us know how you’re going.  And you’re certianly encouraged to read everyone’s posts and see how everyone else is doing and read the material that’s available such as the junkie thinking and the FAQ. Welcome and congratulations once again. Regards OgO — my Quitting smoking page: http://qjc.cjb.net/quit.html Quit Stats home page: http://qjc.cjb.net/quitstats.html  -=- Current version 0.9.3 – released 22/11/2001 -=- Feel free to ICQ me.  My ICQ #: 12889482 I left my Glasses in my email – you better take them out! wun – 3QOF+ – f3as3 – asdfg (ok, I made that last one up :) I have not smoked for: 10 months, 3 weeks, 4 days, 11 hours, 36 minutes and 9 seconds.  6,594 cigarettes not smoked, $2,198.00 saved, life saved 3W 1D 21:29:60.

Response:

Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.  There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.  I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.  I must say that tingling sensation from the gum is quite pleasant…if it wasn’t so outrageously expensive I might get addicted to that. When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh… Eric

Response:

Keep the caffeine Eric… at least for now. And don’t romanticize that late night smoke too much.  It may have felt nice, but you can indeed get along without it and maybe even find something else just as wonderful to enjoy. If the addiction isn’t so hard to break, be aware of how hard it may be to break the habit.  It might take some major reconditioning to get past the emptiness that use to be called routine.  I hope you have been reading and picking up tips on how to deal with those battles. www.quitbuddies.org http://www.bluethunder.org/quitterhome.html You post tugged at me just a bit. You see, my youngest son is turning "the tender age of 13" on Monday.  I sure hope he doesn’t make the same mistake you did.. the same mistake i did… his dad.. his grandmothers…  <sigh ~August OF+

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.  There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.  I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.  I must say that tingling sensation from the gum is quite pleasant…if it wasn’t so outrageously expensive I might get addicted to that. When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh… Eric

Response:

Wise choice Eric on deciding to quit the butts.  You know the old saying,"1 is to many….100 is not enough".  As for what the doctor said, that is crap!!!  I can’t believe a doc would tell you that, but then he probably hacks the butts to.  Just go with your plan to quit and your body will love you for it.  Stick with the gum because it will help.  Good luck and come here often, it helps. stever 9M+

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.  There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.  I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.  I must say that tingling sensation from the gum is quite pleasant…if it wasn’t so outrageously expensive I might get addicted to that. When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh… Eric

Response:

Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh…

Nah indeed …. I doubled my caffiene intake (at least). Do what feels right for you. Welcome aboard, you just made a great decision. A few points to consider tho. The use of NRT while still smoking is against all the advice on the leaflet, and just isn’t worth doing. Besides the risk of overdose, adding to the regular nicotine intake just prior to a quit doesn’t seem logical! Basically, if you are still smoking, you shouldn’t be using Nicotine REPLACEMENT Therapy! NRT in most forms isn’t reccomended anyway for those who smoke 10 cigs a day or less. The possible exception to this would be Gum, but use it sparingly if you can, or you may actually increase the amount of nicotine, over what you had as a smoker. No biggie, just takes longer to get off it is all. Your doctor was wrong! Good luck with your quit, read and post here often. Grab a meter and watch it grow. steveb

Response:

Good for you Eric! Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.  I’m 26 now and I’ve been smoking about 6-10 cigarrettes a day for most of my life.  Not a heavy smoker, but certainly addicted, and very much on a schedule.  One on the way to work, two at lunch, one on the way home, one after supper, one at 8pm, one before bed.  Sometimes more in-between.

You’re an addict as much as the person who smokes three packs a day. The number of cigs really doesn’t matter…the same way someone who has one drink a day is as much an alcoholic as the guy who only binge drinks once a week…   There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.  I will only experience that one more time…tonight.  I really will miss smoking, but I must quit for the sake of my wife and two children.

Give yourself some time to change that mindset. Because it will change. I was a happy smoker for quite some time, and only quit at first because I thought I should. Now…I truly do understand what a nasty and destructive habit it was…   When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.  I was surprised to hear that from a doctor, and it will make it that much harder to quit.  But oh well, here I go reluctantly into a way of life I haven’t known since I was a preteen.

What a pile of bullshit. Just one cigarette will do you damage. How do you know that "one" you smoke is not the one that will cause a cell in your body to mutate and eventually become cancer? I would bet that your doctor is either a smoker, or an ex smoker. You say you were surprised to hear that – I am completely aghast. Please…don’t use his false advice as a reason to blow your quit. I can give you the names of 20 other doctors who will totally disagree with him. Now if I can just give up caffeine!  Nahhhh…

Nah! Just be aware though, that if caffeine is a huge trigger (it was for me) to be careful and make sure you have the gum with you. Also, I drank a LOT of coffee and found that replacing every second cup with a herbal tea made me much less anxious and hyper… Best wishes to you! Post often…we love to hear how newbies are getting on! Paula

Response:

Eric: Well, after smoking since the tender age of 13, today will be my last day as a smoker.

All right! Congratulations on your decision to quit :) … There’s not much I enjoy more than the last cigarrette of the day…standing outside in the silent darkness gazing at the stars and subconsciously listening to the way the burning tobacco crackles as I inhale.

Yes, I romanticized and glamorized sickarettes a lot, too, before I quit. After you get some smober time under your belt, I’ll bet you’ll view this particular ritual a bit differently. … I started Nicorette gum two days ago and and plan to use that until the package is gone.

Eeek…I think steveb already mentioned this, but you aren’t supposed to use the nicotine gum while you are still smoking! You can overdose on nicotine that way (not a pretty thing at all). … When I saw my physician last year, I told him that I was a smoker and he asked how much, and I said 6-10 a day.  He said smoking that few cigarrettes a day is probably benign and that my body has enough time between smokes to clean out the toxins, so they don’t build up.

… Where in the hell did this doctor train? Quack University? That’s absolutely not true! For instance, just one cigarette destroy the cilia in your lungs and it can take up to *nine* *months* for them to regrow. Also, if you don’t quit now, there’s no guarantee you would stay at your current consumption of cigarettes. I believe I read that the longer you smoke, the more you smoke…or it becomes a possibility, anyway. Good luck with your quit, Eric. What works for me (and a lot of quitters) is coming here daily. —– Maddie, 5 months

Response:

2 or 3 cigarettes and didn’t really enjoy any of them.  The gum is really helping.  I think I may have overdosed this weekend, though.  I was chewing the gum, I had too much to drink (I drink alcohol once a year, at most, so my tolerance is VERY low), I was talked into some chronic (another once-per-year-or-so indulgence), and then I smoked a cigarrette.  I found myself in the bathroom puking for two hours and I seriously thought "I am going to die".  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Response:

.  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Ya really gotta watch those little slip ups they can be killers (GRIN) as long as we learn fro our mistakes we will do better next time…. dont give up get back into ur quitting mode and hang in there]] Feequin

Response:

Tough way to learn that lesson Eric! But glad you did… Nothing worse than spending your night in the bathroom thinking that dying would actually be preferable to what you are going through… Post when you need to…we’ll be here Paula

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – 2 or 3 cigarettes and didn’t really enjoy any of them.  The gum is really helping.  I think I may have overdosed this weekend, though.  I was chewing the gum, I had too much to drink (I drink alcohol once a year, at most, so my tolerance is VERY low), I was talked into some chronic (another once-per-year-or-so indulgence), and then I smoked a cigarrette.  I found myself in the bathroom puking for two hours and I seriously thought "I am going to die".  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Response:

been there… done that… never again… when ya think about doing any of those again, remember that night… works for me! good luck to ya mate – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – 2 or 3 cigarettes and didn’t really enjoy any of them.  The gum is really helping.  I think I may have overdosed this weekend, though.  I was chewing the gum, I had too much to drink (I drink alcohol once a year, at most, so my tolerance is VERY low), I was talked into some chronic (another once-per-year-or-so indulgence), and then I smoked a cigarrette.  I found myself in the bathroom puking for two hours and I seriously thought "I am going to die".  I’ve never been that sick in my life.  Alcohol, THC, and super-high levels of nicotine.  I think that was enough for me, I’m taking the straight and narrow path from this point on.  I’ll post another update in a week or so. Eric.

Response:

Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Good shooting !!   I’m in the same boat….  cigs & drinks Best O’ luck 15 hours, 25 minutes and 48 seconds. 19 cigarettes not smoked, saving $4.82. Life saved: 1 hour, 35 minutes. — Facta Non Verba

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

I dunno Austin, I think I would do one at a time. The cravings from smoking withdrawal are bad enough to endure. I can’t imagine both at the same time. I’ve heard of people who have but most of them woke up that way in an I.C.U. BTW, Welcome -Tom

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Thanks, By the way what is the translation of "Facta Non Verba"? just curiours.. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Good shooting !!   I’m in the same boat….  cigs & drinks Best O’ luck 15 hours, 25 minutes and 48 seconds. 19 cigarettes not smoked, saving $4.82. Life saved: 1 hour, 35 minutes. — Facta Non Verba Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

 The logic is that my cigarette cravings are greatly intensified when I’m drinking, also when I’m drinking I dont think as clearly as I do when I’m not and would be more likely to self justify having "Just one smoke". So the way I see it, both habits have to go a once. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I dunno Austin, I think I would do one at a time. The cravings from smoking withdrawal are bad enough to endure. I can’t imagine both at the same time. I’ve heard of people who have but most of them woke up that way in an I.C.U. BTW, Welcome -Tom Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Post all you want.  And when the going gets tough….post some more!! Good to have you here. Chris 2weeks 1day – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm. This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

Good for you Austin.  I hope you have some help from Zyban, or other nicotine replacement therapy. i.e. nicotine gum or patches.  Cold turkey from two packs a day is tough without some help.  Post here often and read the stories of those who have gone before you; I find that they strengthen my resolve. Cheers, Bruce – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

And I would like to add to Bruce’s comment.  I have a friend that drinks way too much.  She feels bad about it and has tried to cut back or quit a few times.  She has told me that she finds Welbutrin (Zyban), which was prescribed for mild depression, to drastically cut down on her alcohol intake.  What Wellbutrin or Zyban originally did for Cocaine addicts, and is now doing for nicotine addicts apparently also helps alcohol addicts.  So, I second Bruce’s thought that if you are not on Zyban or Wellbutrin, you might think seriously about calling your doctor tomorrow for a prescription. BinnieBee Three weeks, three days, 17 hours, 38 minutes and 37 seconds. 742 cigarettes not smoked, saving $122.07. Life saved: 2 days, 13 hours, 50 minutes.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Good for you Austin.  I hope you have some help from Zyban, or other nicotine replacement therapy. i.e. nicotine gum or patches.  Cold turkey from two packs a day is tough without some help.  Post here often and read the stories of those who have gone before you; I find that they strengthen my resolve. Cheers, Bruce Sunday, November 25, 2001, 6:00pm.  This is my chosen quit time. I’m giving up cigarettes and alcohol. I’ve been smoking about 2 packs a day for 15 years and drinking almost every day for the last 10 years. I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like. Sincerely Austin (aka POE)

Response:

In alt.support.stop-smoking, on 26 Nov 2001, Austin House announced: …I will post on my progress from time to time if the group would like.

Congratulations on quitting Austin. Definately feel free to post your progress and let us know how you’re going.  And you’re certianly encouraged to read everyone’s posts and see how everyone else is doing and read the material that’s available such as the junkie thinking and the FAQ. Welcome and congratulations once again. Regards OgO — my Quitting smoking page: http://qjc.cjb.net/quit.html Quit Stats home page: http://qjc.cjb.net/quitstats.html  -=- Current version 0.9.3 – released 22/11/2001 -=- Feel free to ICQ me.  My ICQ #: 12889482 I left my Glasses in my email – you better take them out! wun – 3QOF+ – f3as3 – asdfg (ok, I made that last one up :) I have not smoked for: 10 months, 3 weeks, 4 days, 11 hours, 36 minutes and 9 seconds.  6,594 cigarettes not smoked, $2,198.00 saved, life saved 3W 1D 21:29:60.

Response:

## Cocaine. What Is It Good For?

Question:

Let’s see how many good Catholics we have out there. The use of cocaine in the U.S. is increasing by leaps and bounds. The current estimate of cocaine addicts is around 12.5 million. Of these probably half of them are trying to recruit new addicts so that they can support their habit. People like Morton Downey Jr. right now don

Ritalin Trials

Question:

Any response to this? This sample covers 257 children for 6 months. (collective of 11 studies)  Is this sample size and time period a standard of the info used to determine the "safety and efficiacy" of Ritalin? "In a review of 11 controlled studies that collectively involved 271 children medicated for an average of 6 months, Schachar & Tannock (Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychopharmacology 3:81-97, 1993) found clear benefits in 8 of the 11 studies; i.e., improvement in sustained attention, impulsivity, and excessive motor activity." Connie

Response:

Any response to this?

Yes, the study was done over a 6 month period. I agree that it helps in the beginning. And what a God sent to those who are at ropes end. However from my experience, down the road the original symptoms returned two fold with new ones to boot. Jan

Response:

I agree.  An average of 20 odd per trial, with only a dozen in each treatment group—–?.  But one would have to look at the statistics.  I doubt if these are the only studies of Ritalin. — P Moran – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Any response to this? This sample covers 257 children for 6 months. (collective of 11 studies)  Is this sample size and time period a standard of the info used to determine the "safety and efficiacy" of Ritalin? "In a review of 11 controlled studies that collectively involved 271 children medicated for an average of 6 months, Schachar & Tannock (Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychopharmacology 3:81-97, 1993) found clear benefits in 8 of the 11 studies; i.e., improvement in sustained attention, impulsivity, and excessive motor activity." Connie

Response:

Did you know?    - That Ritalin is a DEA schedule 2 drug, the same as cocaine and heroin?    - Because the chemical composition of cocaine and Ritalin are so similiar, cocaine addicts can’t tell the difference between the two?    - Once bright, creative children are being drugged up and turned into zombies just because they figit or don’t pay attention to a subject they find boring?

Response:

Did you know?   – That Ritalin is a DEA schedule 2 drug, the same as cocaine and heroin?

What exactly does that mean?  That Ritalin is a narcotic?  What is the significance?  How does a drug get to be Schedule 2?   – Because the chemical composition of cocaine and Ritalin are so similiar, cocaine addicts can’t tell the difference between the two?

How is the chemical composition similar?   – Once bright, creative children are being drugged up and turned into zombies just because they figit or don’t pay attention to a subject they find boring?

What leads you to believe this? Joe Parsons

Response:

Anita Uhl Brothers, M.D., of Berkeley, California and I have called for full disclosure labeling for foods and medicines sold to consumers so that the small number of people who are extremely chemically sensitive to a few very common food additives can avoid them if they so choose. http://www.angelfire.com/biz/addsyndrome/index.html http://homepages.msn.com/RightWay/c_thomas_wild/ http://members.tripod.com/adhdsyndrome/ http://www.merck.com/pubs/mmanual/section19/chapter262/262d.htm Thank you. Sincerely, C. Thomas Wild An adult with mild ADHD – Inattentive type predominantly – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Any response to this? This sample covers 257 children for 6 months. (collective of 11 studies)  Is this sample size and time period a standard of the info used to determine the "safety and efficiacy" of Ritalin? "In a review of 11 controlled studies that collectively involved 271 children medicated for an average of 6 months, Schachar & Tannock (Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychopharmacology 3:81-97, 1993) found clear benefits in 8 of the 11 studies; i.e., improvement in sustained attention, impulsivity, and excessive motor activity." Connie

As a large generalization, the one class of medicines known to temporarily improve the ability to pay attention for those with ADHD are the central nervous system stimulants/alerting agents.  Medicines known to temporarily reduce the symptoms of ADHD in some people, not all, include:  Adderall, Caffeine Compounds, Cylert, Desoxyn, Dexedrine, and Ritalin. Before you buy.

Response:

Anita Uhl Brothers, M.D., of Berkeley, California and I have called for full disclosure labeling for foods and medicines sold to consumers so that the small number of people who are extremely chemically sensitive to a few very common food additives can avoid them if they so choose.

Good move.  How are you doing this? Connie

Response:

COLUMBINE MOM'S SUICIDE

Question:

Thank you Aula, well said. Child survivors of suicide are 10XS’s more likely to commit suicide than children who lost parents to a natural or accidental death. The term "suicide" is a misnomer and the correct term is "penacide". Penacide is a latin term for "ending pain" which is the appropriate label for what can sometimes be the ultimate outcome to manic depression or bi-polar disorder. Honestly, the only reason why we even know of this tragedy is because her daughter is still being sensationalized by the media.  Suicide is NOT caused or even exaserbated by outside events.  It is an internal inability to process and handle pain (in most cases the inability to process enough natural seratonin, the bodies own natural "happiness" chemical). Based on the above it is my humble opinion that Mom remaining untreated for her illness is what caused her actions and it had very little, if anything, to do with the horror at Columbine High School or readily available guns. While forming opinions about various issues is natural, the act of judging is reserved for those who have ALL the facts.  None of us have the luxary of having all the facts, so judgement based on ignorance or arrogance would not be too balanced or fair. Sarah Founder of Supporters of Suicide Survivors www.onelist.com/community/SOSS survivor of Michael Hannigan 10/9/70-3/10/98 Husband and Father To learn more about Penacide, Depression or Alcoholism http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Thebes/1591 40,000 annual suicides directly affect an average of 10 people….do the math.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – To judge does not have to mean to condemn.  It could mean to assess and develop an appropriate plan to intervene, when needed.  So, if we are going to judge, why can’t we attempt to accurately assess a situation so that we can impact on it to change the parts that are detrimental to someone [ie: depression to point of self injury] rather than to shake our heads and tisk tisk while walking away from the grave.  If we really rightly judge this situation, then it is likely that a major effort to support the survivors is now required.  Children of parents who have committed suicide have a much higher rate of suicide themselves. – Aula It "IS" true, it was on the news yesterday.  I can’t decide if it was because she couldn’t handle taking care of her daughter or to make a point about how easy it is to get (and use or mis-use) guns.  Either way I don’t know how she could do that to her daughter.  Very selfish in my opinion. It isn’t your or my option to judge her.  Obviously she had her own problems to deal with.  People who commit suicide in cases like this are usually suffering from depression, which is a medical condition and treatable. It has little or nothing to do with selfishness.  It’s just too bad nobody recognized her plight in time to help her. perhaps — but one of the ways a civilized society tries to  maintain some sort of norms is by ‘judging’.  The idea that ANY behavior including men abandoning their wives and children to ‘find themselves’ and mothers abandoning their newly paralyzed daughter is acceptable doesn’t provide the kind of peer disapproval that helps shape decent behavior.  Perhaps she was truly deeply sick — and couldn’t help herself — but plenty of selfish behavior is excused on grounds that we shouldn’t be ‘judgmental’.

Response:

You know something catlovr, you have no clue. Yes it was a selfish thing and it was a shame, but you could not possibly speculate what she has been through or even say that you wouldn’t do the same thing in her situation, cause you just don’t know. Sitting back in your easy chair taking pot-shots through your computer at some of the most traumatized people  in the world to me doesn’t seem very decent.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – MOTHER OF COLUMBINE VICTIM KILLS HERSELF Updated 9:02 PM ET October 22, 1999 DENVER (Reuters) – The mother of a girl partially paralyzed in the Columbine High School rampage walked into a pawn shop Friday, asked to see a gun and then used it to shoot herself to death with her own ammunition, police said.  Carla Hochhalter, 48, shot herself in the head with a .38 caliber handgun while a store clerk was performing a background check to authorize her purchase, a spokeswoman for the Englewood Police Department said.  Hochhalter — whose 17-year-old daughter Anne Marie was shot several times and left partially paralyzed in the April 20 massacre at the high school in Littleton, Colorado — was pronounced dead at the same hospital where her daughter  was treated for her wounds. Anne Marie Hochhalter, who police said was at school when her mother committed suicide, was one of the most seriously injured of the 23 students wounded in the bullet-and-bombs rampage by seniors Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. The daughter had moved her legs for the first time last week. Well, that’s a heck of a way to blow your nomination for "Colorado Mother of the Year." We must ask ourselves, what is amiss with the coiffured Columbine moms? First, we saw Misty Bernal use a crayon to scribble out her literary masterpiece, "She Said Yes: The Unlikely Martyrdom of Cassie Bernall," that shopped  the  lie that her daughter used her last gasps to suck up to Jesus before one of the Columbine lads pumped her with more lead than a No. 2 pencil. Apparently, the J-Man was otherwise occupied. Now we have Carla Hochhalter gunning for a little post-Columbine publicity by splattering herself across the local pawn shop even before the mid-morning crack cocaine addicts could arrive to hock the largess they burgled the previous evening from swank Boulder homes. Once again the actions of a few miscreants will sully the carefully honed reputations of the gun and pawn shop industry that has been responsible for so much of the Dow’s meteoric rise these past four years. We clearly speak for everyone in alt.parenting.solutions when we ask why Carla Hochhalter would take an action that guarantees her daughter a life of permanent psychological dysfunction.  If a few slugs from her classmates weren’t enough, Mommy Hochhalter decides to finish the job of daughter Marie’s Total Mental Destruction just days after the teen wiggles her big toe for the first time since Eric and Dylan staged their little bit of performance art with her in a front row seat. Is this bimbo’s choice a viable "parenting solution"? Mommy Hochhalter hocked it all at the local pawn shop.  Now she is a minor celebrity–a footnote in an obscure chapter of the Columbine High School textbook on Murder 10l. In Carla Hochhalter we have seen the once-dominant Soccer Mom murderously supplanted  by the even more lethal SUV Shotgun Mom. We call upon the remaining Columbine Moms to do the right thing and get their few seconds of show-biz celebrity before Columbine fades away like their distant high school memories. To all remaining Columbine Moms, now is your last chance to take a cue from Carla Hochhalter. Step forward and permanently insult the memories of  your dead and permanently disfigured whelps by engaging in one final act of maudlin, narcissistic self-pity. Preferably, do it before the 5 O’Clock Evening News production deadline.

Response:

To judge does not have to mean to condemn.  It could mean to assess and develop an appropriate plan to intervene, when needed.  So, if we are going to judge, why can’t we attempt to accurately assess a situation so that we can impact on it to change the parts that are detrimental to someone [ie: depression to point of self injury] rather than to shake our heads and tisk tisk while walking away from the grave.  If we really rightly judge this situation, then it is likely that a major effort to support the survivors is now required.  Children of parents who have committed suicide have a much higher rate of suicide themselves. – Aula – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – It "IS" true, it was on the news yesterday.  I can’t decide if it was because she couldn’t handle taking care of her daughter or to make a point about how easy it is to get (and use or mis-use) guns.  Either way I don’t know how she could do that to her daughter.  Very selfish in my opinion. It isn’t your or my option to judge her.  Obviously she had her own problems to deal with.  People who commit suicide in cases like this are usually suffering from depression, which is a medical condition and treatable. It has little or nothing to do with selfishness.  It’s just too bad nobody recognized her plight in time to help her. perhaps — but one of the ways a civilized society tries to  maintain some sort of norms is by ‘judging’.  The idea that ANY behavior including men abandoning their wives and children to ‘find themselves’ and mothers abandoning their newly paralyzed daughter is acceptable doesn’t provide the kind of peer disapproval that helps shape decent behavior.  Perhaps she was truly deeply sick — and couldn’t help herself — but plenty of selfish behavior is excused on grounds that we shouldn’t be ‘judgmental’.

Response:

It "IS" true, it was on the news yesterday.  I can’t decide if it was because she couldn’t handle taking care of her daughter or to make a point about how easy it is to get (and use or mis-use) guns.  Either way I don’t know how she could do that to her daughter.  Very selfish in my opinion. It isn’t your or my option to judge her.  Obviously she had her own problems to deal with.  People who commit suicide in cases like this are usually suffering from depression, which is a medical condition and treatable. It has little or nothing to do with selfishness.  It’s just too bad nobody recognized her plight in time to help her.

perhaps — but one of the ways a civilized society tries to  maintain some sort of norms is by ‘judging’.  The idea that ANY behavior including men abandoning their wives and children to ‘find themselves’ and mothers abandoning their newly paralyzed daughter is acceptable doesn’t provide the kind of peer disapproval that helps shape decent behavior.  Perhaps she was truly deeply sick — and couldn’t help herself — but plenty of selfish behavior is excused on grounds that we shouldn’t be ‘judgmental’.

Response:

It "IS" true, it was on the news yesterday.  I can’t decide if it was because she couldn’t handle taking care of her daughter or to make a point about how easy it is to get (and use or mis-use) guns.  Either way I don’t know how she could do that to her daughter.  Very selfish in my opinion.

It isn’t your or my option to judge her.  Obviously she had her own problems to deal with.  People who commit suicide in cases like this are usually suffering from depression, which is a medical condition and treatable. It has little or nothing to do with selfishness.  It’s just too bad nobody recognized her plight in time to help her. Later, Sophie mom to Charlotte (15 months) and baby #2 due 11/10

Paul J. Koeck replace Byte.Me with newsguy to reply

Response:

Ah, a humorous flame war eh?  Well, it’s a change alright. I loved my cats.  I hated the cat box.  They couldn’t go outside so….. I’ll take my Pekinese. ;-) I hated diapers too, but I kept the kids. And hey….dogs are cool….just dumb as hell.

They are, (dumb dogs) I’ll give you that.  But while changing the litter box my cats didn’t look up at me and say "kiss?"  then giggle as I kiss their tummys. Kendra Proud to be "Outlandish"! http://www.crosswinds.net/~graphicsbykendra http://www.crosswinds.net/~outlandish *Something to consider* "Amatures built the ark, professionals built the Titanic."

Response:

<snip We clearly speak for everyone in alt.parenting.solutions…. None of your crap speaks for me. Just WHAT is your point?  Do you honestly believe that she (if it’s true, I haven’t heard a word of it in the news)

 Wierd, isn’t it? The major news services didn’t pick up the story. I heard it on Usenet. Then Drudge picked it up, but he gets a lot of his stuff from newsgroups anyway.

Response:

Wierd, isn’t it? The major news services didn’t pick up the story. I heard it on Usenet. Then Drudge picked it up, but he gets a lot of his stuff from newsgroups anyway.

It’s taken a couple of days but I did finally hear about it on our local news. (technically not "local", I think it was a Bay Area station)  And it wasn’t a major news story for them.  Seems like it was mentioned halfway through. Considering we are close to the 6 month (?) anniversary of it I think it’s weird, too, that it wasn’t talked about more. Kendra Proud to be "Outlandish"! http://www.crosswinds.net/~graphicsbykendra http://www.crosswinds.net/~outlandish *Something to consider* "Amatures built the ark, professionals built the Titanic."

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – You gotta be kidding, right? People have always gotten very passionate about issues involving their children…..and understandably so. But what on earth is there to argue over about cats? Everyone already knows that they are self-reliant, sulky, moody, stubborn, snooty, independent, aloof, clean, quiet, intelligent, and basically the only animal worth owning, right? ;) Ah, a humorous flame war eh?  Well, it’s a change alright. I loved my cats.  I hated the cat box.  They couldn’t go outside so….. I’ll take my Pekinese. ;-)

I hated diapers too, but I kept the kids. And hey….dogs are cool….just dumb as hell. Josie

Response:

Troll. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – MOTHER OF COLUMBINE VICTIM KILLS HERSELF Updated 9:02 PM ET October 22, 1999 DENVER (Reuters) – The mother of a girl partially paralyzed in the Columbine High School rampage walked into a pawn shop Friday, asked to see a gun and then used it to shoot herself to death with her own ammunition, police said.  Carla Hochhalter, 48, shot herself in the head with a .38 caliber handgun while a store clerk was performing a background check to authorize her purchase, a spokeswoman for the Englewood Police Department said.  Hochhalter — whose 17-year-old daughter Anne Marie was shot several times and left partially paralyzed in the April 20 massacre at the high school in Littleton, Colorado — was pronounced dead at the same hospital where her daughter  was treated for her wounds. Anne Marie Hochhalter, who police said was at school when her mother committed suicide, was one of the most seriously injured of the 23 students wounded in the bullet-and-bombs rampage by seniors Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. The daughter had moved her legs for the first time last week.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, that

Mammograms Advised for Young Women

Question:

Frederica wrote:

In article <8uky3.6334$C%.4307550@WReNphoon3, dr…@juno.com (lisa Abel-Ben-Dror) wrote: Human Beings! What will it be with us? Important though it is to maintain my status as a lady of grace and good manners, I simply must state: "HUNH???"

Thank you, Freddy. You took the words right out of my mouth. (Well, actually, I was thinking "WTF???", but obviously you’re better bred than I am.) –Pat Kight Wondering if "lisa" perhaps indulged once too often in the Subject: line reference… kig…@peak.org

Response:

 Human Beings! What will it be with us?    -**** Posted from RemarQ, http://www.remarq.com/?b ****-  Real Discussions for Real People

Response:

In article <8uky3.6334$C%.4307550@WReNphoon3

,

dr…@juno.com (lisa Abel-Ben-Dror) wrote:

Human Beings! What will it be with us?

Important though it is to maintain my status as a lady of grace and good manners, I simply must state: "HUNH???" Frederica * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

"Eva D. Struction" <EvaDSt…@aol.com

wrote: [her postings never

reach my ISP, so this is copied from an email copy, and thus improperly linked.]

Chris Malcolm wrote in message <7pppde$ai…@scotsman.ed.ac.uk… ….[M]y grandfather, a country doctor in Kent, England, became a cocaine addict while a medical student, and remained a cocaine addict until his death at age 96. By that time he had outlived three wives, and used to tell us that he gave up practicising medicine when he found he was signing increasing numbers of death certificates for people whose birth certificates he had signed. Was his unusually long and healthy life due to his moderate and well-regulated use of cocaine? Chris, you previously mentioned that you have ADD….Is it possible your grandfather’s long-term cocaine use was a form of self-medication for ADD?

Well spotted! I never thought of that! (ADD does run in families.) I know that cocaine is regarded by some ADD specialists as one of the best treatment drugs for ADD, but because of its involvement in the Drugs Wars, doctors daren’t prescribe it, or check this out further by applying for research studies grants.

If, as you say, he was able to function so well on it, which I think is pretty unusual among cocaine users–most of them eventually freak out AFAIK.

Most of them? Lots of doctors of Freud’s generation, like Freud, became life-long cocaine addicts, and certainly many of them didn’t freak out. Did Freud freak out? The fictional Sherlock Holmes (a cocaine addict) was modelled on real live instances of professional educated capable men who used cocaine, and Holmes displayed many of the classic symptoms of adult ADD. The Drugs Wars have made life much harder for cocaine addicts, or, if you like, cocaine self-medicators, because their supplies are not reliable in either timing or quality. Just think what it would be like being a diabetic if you had to buy your insulin on the street from criminals who were trying to swindle you. Just think — those of you using medication to help with menopause — what it would be like if you had to buy your HRT, glandulars, whatever, from street criminals who were trying to swindle you. Or even reputable legal drug companies and properly qualified doctors who are trying to swindle you, as the lady over there with the placard and megaphone wants to explain to you. — Chris Malcolm     c…@dai.ed.ac.uk         +44 (0)131 650 3085 School of Artificial Intelligence,     Division of Informatics   Edinburgh University,   5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK <http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/daidb/people/homes/cam/

    DoD #205

Response:

I breast fed all three of our children in public and in church.  I never felt a need to go shirtless while doing it–in fact it was very easy to be gracefully modest about it.  My son had a disconcerting habit of "crowing" (the pediatrician called it crowing.  He made a noise when he gulped in the milk)  while he drank which drew everyone’s attention in a quiet place such as church.  Otherwise no one would have known what was going on.  I never was aware of or informed of doing something against the law.  There was one waitress who asked me if I wouldn’t rather feed the baby in the bathroom.  I asked her if that was where she ate and she left me alone.  Perhaps if more women just do it, people will start to accept it as a natural and necessary thing to do and not something "dirty". I understand what Jane is saying here about the double standard regarding shirtlessness in general, but I don’t understand her reference to public breast feeding being illegal. Kalli Jane Weaver <jgwea…@erols.com

wrote in message

news:7pqfkl$3ni$1@autumn.news.rcn.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

Who knows, if we have a female pres or vice pres, we may see women legally nursing babies in public in the U.S.  I will never understand why American women’s chests are still dirty (and we can be jailed for going shirtless, even to feed babies, while men enjoy that freedom), while we can show topless women in other countries on tv or in magazines for general

audiences

if they are "natives."  Whites are never "natives."  What a strange world. –Jane

Response:

Chris Malcolm writes:

My grandfather attributed his health and longevity to refusing to use motor cars except for occasional long journeys. He did buy them for his wives to do the shopping etc., but insisted that cars killed their drivers through the physical idleness they encouraged. He walked or cycled for daily transport. The only one of his children to keep to his cycling advocacy lived on average ten years longer than her siblings.

I believe that Chris’s grandfather is right. Those Aunties I keep mentioning as exemplars of strong bones? No cars. I do believe that surburban flight is killing us in more ways than one. ("I do believe" means that this is an opinion, for anyone who might miss that little fact.) Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)

Response:

In article <JAXv3.2386$IA6.61…@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net

,

"Joan Livingston" <joan.livingst…@gte.net

wrote:    Carl Sagan, it was revealed in the media today, was a long time marijuana user and credited it for some of his more profound insights.

I thought this was common knowledge. Karen * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

Since we may be electing a president soon who is the son of the 2nd in command when the war on drugs was spearheaded (and who kept it alive), and since he’s bluntly stated that he doen’t intend to discuss something that happened more than 15 years ago (response to the question did he ever use illegal drugs), we may see some changes in U.S. legislation. Who knows, if we have a female pres or vice pres, we may see women legally nursing babies in public in the U.S.  I will never understand why American women’s chests are still dirty (and we can be jailed for going shirtless, even to feed babies, while men enjoy that freedom), while we can show topless women in other countries on tv or in magazines for general audiences if they are "natives."  Whites are never "natives."  What a strange world. –Jane Pat Kight <kig…@ucs.orst.edu

wrote in message

news:7ppiel$alm$1@news.NERO.NET… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

In article <JAXv3.2386$IA6.61…@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net, Joan Livingston <joan.livingst…@gte.net wrote:  All in the land of speculation, but these questions needs to be asked about this younger generation of premature deaths when there is a history

of

"recreational" drug use. Who is keeping the statistics on this? And when there is a chilling factor of a police state mentality as Chris suggests, how will we ever find out? Well, you won’t find out from me. Sorry, but Chris made a pretty good point about the inadvisability of (ahem) "confessing" recreational drug use in any detail in this — OR ANY OTHER — newsgroup. Remember, I’m one of those people who doesn’t squirm about posting fairly intimate details of my life under my real name. But even I see the foolishness of posting to Usenet about activities which are, to put it bluntly, illegal. Joan is correct, it would be useful to have a reliable statistical base on this subject. But as long as the US, at any rate, continues to wage a legal (and IMHO, misguided) "war on drugs," don’t expect a lot of people to step forward and say, "Oh, yeah, I used drugs." As to whether the newsgroup itself might be a hostile atmosphere for such disclosures — well, YMMV. I’ve encountered some fairly judgmental attitudes about everything from alcohol to sex here, but I know that my own attitudes on those subjects are not necessarily mainstream, so I don’t let it bother me. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org

Response:

In article <JAXv3.2386$IA6.61…@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net

,

Joan Livingston <joan.livingst…@gte.net

wrote:  All in the land of speculation, but these questions needs to be asked about this younger generation of premature deaths when there is a history of "recreational" drug use. Who is keeping the statistics on this? And when there is a chilling factor of a police state mentality as Chris suggests, how will we ever find out?

Well, you won’t find out from me. Sorry, but Chris made a pretty good point about the inadvisability of (ahem) "confessing" recreational drug use in any detail in this — OR ANY OTHER — newsgroup. Remember, I’m one of those people who doesn’t squirm about posting fairly intimate details of my life under my real name. But even I see the foolishness of posting to Usenet about activities which are, to put it bluntly, illegal. Joan is correct, it would be useful to have a reliable statistical base on this subject. But as long as the US, at any rate, continues to wage a legal (and IMHO, misguided) "war on drugs," don’t expect a lot of people to step forward and say, "Oh, yeah, I used drugs." As to whether the newsgroup itself might be a hostile atmosphere for such disclosures — well, YMMV. I’ve encountered some fairly judgmental attitudes about everything from alcohol to sex here, but I know that my own attitudes on those subjects are not necessarily mainstream, so I don’t let it bother me. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org

Response:

More on the exploration of this topic regardlesss of Chris’ warning that this topic will be policed by extremists on this newsgroup:     Carl Sagan, it was revealed in the media today, was a long time marijuana user and credited it for some of his more profound insights. Car Sagan also died a grotesque death wasting for many years at a prematjure age, and finally succumbed to pneumonia. Was their a marijuana exacerbation in this death? How would this ever be known? Did he reveal  this marijuana use  with his MDs?    All we have now is anecdote. But what about Linda McCartney’s premature death from BCA and her piror history of marijuana use, having been arrested several times over long sequences of time. Did this exacerbate her possible use of "natural" plant based HRT leading to a more aggressive BCA?   All in the land of speculation, but these questions needs to be asked about this younger generation of premature deaths when there is a history of "recreational" drug use. Who is keeping the statistics on this? And when there is a chilling factor of a police state mentality as Chris suggests, how will we ever find out? J – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Chris Malcolm wrote in message <7ppeq9$ab…@scotsman.ed.ac.uk

… "Joan Livingston" <joan.livingst…@gte.net writes: ote in message <19990820123318.24661.00000…@ng-ch1.aol.com… Chris Malcolm writes: . I don’t find it in the slightest surprising that they are not sharing the accumulated wisdom of decades of recreational drug use with this newsgroup. There are too many fiercely intolerant dogmatists here  This is really a polarizing statement that now puts a chilling effect

on

the discussion topic. Name names Chris, if you want to curtail discussion I don’t want to curtail discussion or start a wild choose chase, which is why I didn’t mention names. You just made an overly broad indictment that demeans the need for exploration of the health issues for this very diverse group of women who post here, and a generation that has far more comfort with "recreational" drug use that needs to start being heard. Nothing I said demeans the need for exploration of the issue, or indeed makes any comment or implication at all on the need for exploration of the issue.  I would ignore Chris’ overly broad reaction and ask for proof of this statement, unless it is only his projection coming from his own self-imposed censorship and discomfort. Joan, you are getting carried away by your soap-box here. You know me, Chris Malcolm, remember me? Remember the arguments we’ve had? Can you think of the slightest suspicion that I’m suffering discomfort from self-imposed censorship?     That is stupid, (it goes beyond sillly)  and I hope Chris will

rethink

his position on this critical area. What you think my position is was, as usual, invented by your own careless reading and overweight agenda.  Right now there is a movement to legalize medical uses of marijuana and

to

respond to Chris’s taboo on this topic cuts off meaningful exploration to the detriment of women who he allegedly wants to help. If you can find any support for that last sentence in anything I have written anywhere in any newsgroup over the last ten years I’ll eat my hat. By the way, what happened to me being in your killfile so this newsgroup could be spared the tedium of these self-constructed disputes which you imagine to be discussions? — Chris Malcolm     c…@dai.ed.ac.uk         +44 (0)131 650 3085 School of Artificial Intelligence,     Division of Informatics Edinburgh University,   5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK <http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/daidb/people/homes/cam/     DoD #205

Response:

On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:34:18 GMT, "Joan Livingston" <joan.livingst…@gte.net

wrote:

<much snipped

 Right now there is a movement to legalize medical uses of marijuana and to respond to Chris’s taboo on this topic cuts off meaningful exploration to the detriment of women who he allegedly wants to help. J

Besides we have talked about endogenous cannabinoids on the newsgroup in regard to the uterus. And certainly chocolate, lots about the mood altering effects of chocolate. And the gender differences over chocolate. Kathryn droz…@home.com

Response:

"Joan Livingston" <joan.livingst…@gte.net

writes: ote in message <19990820123318.24661.00000…@ng-ch1.aol.com… Chris Malcolm writes: . I don’t find it in the slightest surprising that they are not sharing the accumulated wisdom of decades of recreational drug use with this newsgroup. There are too many fiercely intolerant dogmatists here  This is really a polarizing statement that now puts a chilling effect  on the discussion topic. Name names Chris, if you want to curtail discussion

I don’t want to curtail discussion or start a wild choose chase, which is why I didn’t mention names.

You just made an overly broad indictment that demeans the need for exploration of the health issues for this very diverse group of women who post here, and a generation that has far more comfort with "recreational" drug use that needs to start being heard.

Nothing I said demeans the need for exploration of the issue, or indeed makes any comment or implication at all on the need for exploration of the issue.

 I would ignore Chris’ overly broad reaction and ask for proof of this statement, unless it is only his projection coming from his own self-imposed censorship and discomfort.

Joan, you are getting carried away by your soap-box here. You know me, Chris Malcolm, remember me? Remember the arguments we’ve had? Can you think of the slightest suspicion that I’m suffering discomfort from self-imposed censorship?

    That is stupid, (it goes beyond sillly)  and I hope Chris will rethink his position on this critical area.

What you think my position is was, as usual, invented by your own careless reading and overweight agenda.

 Right now there is a movement to legalize medical uses of marijuana and to respond to Chris’s taboo on this topic cuts off meaningful exploration to the detriment of women who he allegedly wants to help.

If you can find any support for that last sentence in anything I have written anywhere in any newsgroup over the last ten years I’ll eat my hat. By the way, what happened to me being in your killfile so this newsgroup could be spared the tedium of these self-constructed disputes which you imagine to be discussions? — Chris Malcolm     c…@dai.ed.ac.uk         +44 (0)131 650 3085 School of Artificial Intelligence,     Division of Informatics   Edinburgh University,   5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK <http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/daidb/people/homes/cam/

    DoD #205

Response:

Chris Malcolm writes:

Many of the female "flower-power" "psychedelic revolution" hippies etc. who took much larger quantities of more various hallucinogens than any previous generation are now in menopause. Some of them are reading this newsgroup, and some of them are still using the recreational drugs they enjoy. Many of them also took the birth control pill at one time or another. I don’t find it in the slightest surprising that they are not sharing the accumulated wisdom of decades of recreational drug use with this newsgroup. There are too many fiercely intolerant dogmatists here

Leaving aside the issue of tolerance and dogma for a moment, there are other compelling reasons for not sharing that accumulated widom with 72 million of our closest friends on the Internet. For example: who knows what insurance adjuster may be searching the internet looking for reasons to deny someone’s health claims on the grounds of recreational drug use in the past creating a pre-existing condition? Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)

Response:

J…@lotos-land.demon.co.uk wrote in message

<37d1472f.4131…@news.demon.co.uk

… I guess this would depend on which recreational drugs. It would be possible to look to the Arab world to learn more about the effects of hashish, the Andes to learn about ‘coca’ leaves and the Orient to learn about opium. But the problem is that in the west such drugs were rarely used in their natural form. How would one factor in the adulteration. Joanna

  I wonder if there are cultural taboos about women, particularly if they are of child bearing age, using these products. I know in Figi when I was living out in some remote villages, only the men would participate in the "yangona" (kava) ceremony. I saw a lot of women chewing kwat in Dijbouti, but they were all elderly women.    J

Response:

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:15:32 -0600, Victoria <cas…@earthlink.net

wrote:

Terri, I read these statistics and they line up with others I’ve read in the past few years.  But I have vivid recall of keeping a log in 1990 of the number of deaths of patients in our practice (town of 65,000)  in their 30’s and 40’s who died the same year from breast cancer.    We lost five  patients that year alone who were in their 30’s and nine  who were in their 40’s. I believe six had inflammatory primary tumors which was unbelievable as it is highly aggressive and rare.  The same six were diagnosed and died within the same 12 month time frame. I left oncology the same year but the women who died and the seemingly high numbers are still with me.  I don’t even remember the count for those 50 and up. Victoria

It must have been horrible to see these young women die Victoria. A young women ( I really could’t tell her age at that point ) was sharing the same palliative care room with my m-i-l, both of them dying from cancer, both on morphine so lots of black humour, but still it was so much worse to see this happening to the young woman. I have some statisics in a brochure for risk of developing breast cancer at different ages. As I mentioned in an earlier post, mammogram screenings are done age 40 and up here in British Columbia. They are not done before age 40 because the risk is so low but it is more than that. If you are younger, there is a much higher risk of a false positive and that cancels out any benefit of screening at this younger age. Here is the chart, figures are probably local but should not be all that different worldwide. Risk of developing breast cancer in the next five years, based on your current age is: 30 = 1 in 650 35 = 1 in 400 40 = 1 in 200 45 = 1 in 125 50 = 1 in 110 60 = 1 in 95 70 = 1 in 65 80 = 1 in 65 [ Taken from Information about screening mammograms for women in their 50's 60's and 70's. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia] Kathryn droz…@home.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mammograms Advised for Young Women ———————————- Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer every 12 to 18 months because the disease progresses more quickly in younger women than in older women, a team of international researchers says. Researchers led by Dr. Laszlo Tabar of Central Hospital in Falun, Sweden, studied data on more than 77,000 women. They calculated that if women ages 40 to 54 had mammograms once a year, it would reduce mortality by 32 percent, Dr. Tabar says. The research team also points out that, compared to women who are not screened regularly, women who have regular mammograms have smaller tumors that are less likely to spread to other areas of the body at the time breast cancer is diagnosed. Currently, the National Cancer Institute recommends that women over age 40 be screened for breast cancer every one to two years, and that women in that age group with a family history of the illness consult a physician about having more frequent screenings. The American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms for women ages 40 to 50. However, there is no consensus on breast cancer screening recommendations for women in their 30s and early 40s. This report appears in the August issue of Cancer.      RELATED LINKS:      Mammograms Before 50      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,1889.asp      Mammograms and Self-Exams: Two Breast Cancer Weapons      http://onhealth.com/ch1/columnist/item,14249.asp      Jeanne’s Breast Cancer Diary      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,34045.asp      Women Need Yearly Mammograms      http://onhealth.com/ch1/briefs/item,41280.asp

Response:

ote in message <19990820123318.24661.00000…@ng-ch1.aol.com

… Chris Malcolm writes: . I don’t find it in the slightest surprising that they are not sharing the accumulated wisdom of decades of recreational drug use with this newsgroup. There are too many fiercely intolerant dogmatists here

  This is really a polarizing statement that now puts a chilling effect  on the discussion topic.Name names Chris, if you want to curtail discussion and let’s air this issue truthfully.  You just made an overly broad indictment that demeans the need for exploration of the health issues for this very diverse group of women who post here, and a generation that has far more comfort with "recreational" drug use that needs to start being heard.   I would ignore Chris’ overly broad reaction and ask for proof of this statement, unless it is only his projection coming from his own self-imposed censorship and discomfort.  It is an important  health issue and it needs to be incorporated into the health care discussion for good or bad. But right now there is no value in chasing down diagnostic paths with huge gaps missing in the information gathering stage.      That is stupid, (it goes beyond sillly)  and I hope Chris will rethink his position on this critical area. Keeping health issues taboo and in the realm of secrecy serves no one and no one is here to police these issues personally, only asking what is known about this potential interaction. And a plea to start exploring these issues. They are important, just as smoking and alcohol use have been critically important to fully understanding health issues.   Right now there is a movement to legalize medical uses of marijuana and to respond to Chris’s taboo on this topic cuts off meaningful exploration to the detriment of women who he allegedly wants to help. J – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

Leaving aside the issue of tolerance and dogma for a moment, there are

other

compelling reasons for not sharing that accumulated widom with 72 million

of

our closest friends on the Internet. For example: who knows what insurance adjuster may be searching the internet looking for reasons to deny

someone’s

health claims on the grounds of recreational drug use in the past creating

a

pre-existing condition? Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant

for

Menopause & Beyond)

Response:

On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 03:08:41 GMT, droz…@home.com (Kathryn) wrote:

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:15:32 -0600, Victoria <cas…@earthlink.net wrote: Terri, I read these statistics and they line up with others I’ve read in the past few years.  But I have vivid recall of keeping a log in 1990 of the number of deaths of patients in our practice (town of 65,000)  in their 30’s and 40’s who died the same year from breast cancer.    We lost five  patients that year alone who were in their 30’s and nine  who were in their 40’s. I believe six had inflammatory primary tumors which was unbelievable as it is highly aggressive and rare.  The same six were diagnosed and died within the same 12 month time frame. I left oncology the same year but the women who died and the seemingly high numbers are still with me.  I don’t even remember the count for those 50 and up. Victoria

I’m replying to you within Kathryn’s post because your original never appeared on my server, so if I’m missing some part of your post I apologize. This number of breast cancer deaths within this very small population surely qualified as a "cluster." Was any investigation done as to what might have led to this very high rate of breast cancer in young women at that time in that place? Or, and I suggest this as a possibility only, was the center where you were working a major center for breast cancer of a certain type and would this possibly have skewed the numbers because the patients were coming to this specialized facility/practice from long distances? As a student I worked on the cardiac surgery unit of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. Since we then had the renowned Dr Fred Mustard on staff, and since the Toronto HSC was a world renowned institution for pediatric cardiac surgery I saw many children with very rare congenital heart defects and other heart disease – only when one looked at the "catchment" area did the numbers line up with the more general statistics. Terri – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

It must have been horrible to see these young women die Victoria. A young women ( I really could’t tell her age at that point ) was sharing the same palliative care room with my m-i-l, both of them dying from cancer, both on morphine so lots of black humour, but still it was so much worse to see this happening to the young woman. I have some statisics in a brochure for risk of developing breast cancer at different ages. As I mentioned in an earlier post, mammogram screenings are done age 40 and up here in British Columbia. They are not done before age 40 because the risk is so low but it is more than that. If you are younger, there is a much higher risk of a false positive and that cancels out any benefit of screening at this younger age. Here is the chart, figures are probably local but should not be all that different worldwide. Risk of developing breast cancer in the next five years, based on your current age is: 30 = 1 in 650 35 = 1 in 400 40 = 1 in 200 45 = 1 in 125 50 = 1 in 110 60 = 1 in 95 70 = 1 in 65 80 = 1 in 65 [ Taken from Information about screening mammograms for women in their 50's 60's and 70's. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia] Kathryn droz…@home.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mammograms Advised for Young Women ———————————- Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer every 12 to 18 months because the disease progresses more quickly in younger women than in older women, a team of international researchers says. Researchers led by Dr. Laszlo Tabar of Central Hospital in Falun, Sweden, studied data on more than 77,000 women. They calculated that if women ages 40 to 54 had mammograms once a year, it would reduce mortality by 32 percent, Dr. Tabar says. The research team also points out that, compared to women who are not screened regularly, women who have regular mammograms have smaller tumors that are less likely to spread to other areas of the body at the time breast cancer is diagnosed. Currently, the National Cancer Institute recommends that women over age 40 be screened for breast cancer every one to two years, and that women in that age group with a family history of the illness consult a physician about having more frequent screenings. The American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms for women ages 40 to 50. However, there is no consensus on breast cancer screening recommendations for women in their 30s and early 40s. This report appears in the August issue of Cancer.      RELATED LINKS:      Mammograms Before 50      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,1889.asp      Mammograms and Self-Exams: Two Breast Cancer Weapons      http://onhealth.com/ch1/columnist/item,14249.asp      Jeanne’s Breast Cancer Diary      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,34045.asp      Women Need Yearly Mammograms      http://onhealth.com/ch1/briefs/item,41280.asp

Response:

In article <37bf5e48.3196…@news.darientel.net

,

AneeBear <AneeB…@bigfoot.com

wrote: This came along with the one on HRT, same goes for this one…except that I have one comment. The title is Mammograms Advised for Young Women…..then the first line says…."Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer….." Does this mean I am not "young" anymore because I am over 50?? frown<

Well, Anee, the calendar doesn’t lie. (-; (Or, as I told a friend who objected when I described myself as "middle-aged": "Hey, I’m almost 50. If I’m *lucky*, this is only the middle!") –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org

Response:

On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:11:48 GMT, AneeB…@bigfoot.com (AneeBear) wrote:

This came along with the one on HRT, same goes for this one…except that I have one comment. The title is Mammograms Advised for Young Women…..then the first line says…."Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer….." Does this mean I am not "young" anymore because I am over 50?? frown< AneeBear

Mammograms done on women in their 40’s are more difficult to read and even more subject to false positives and unnecessary anxiety and "treatment" than mammograms done on women in their 50’s and beyond. The same is true of mammograms on women who take post menopausal hormones. For women under 40 this risk is magnified because their breats are even more dense. The absolute numbers of breast cancer cases in women under age 40 is very tiny, so that huge 32% translates into a very small number. The risk of developing breast cancer between age 30 and 40 is .4% and the risk of dying of it is .1%. So out of 10000 women given yearly mammograms between ages 30 and 40, 3 fewer would die of breast cancer than would have done without. And there would be at least 1 more case of breast cancer because of the radiation from the test. Hmmmm… that 32% doesn’t look so terribly impressive any more does it? Terri – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mammograms Advised for Young Women ———————————- Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer every 12 to 18 months because the disease progresses more quickly in younger women than in older women, a team of international researchers says. Researchers led by Dr. Laszlo Tabar of Central Hospital in Falun, Sweden, studied data on more than 77,000 women. They calculated that if women ages 40 to 54 had mammograms once a year, it would reduce mortality by 32 percent, Dr. Tabar says. The research team also points out that, compared to women who are not screened regularly, women who have regular mammograms have smaller tumors that are less likely to spread to other areas of the body at the time breast cancer is diagnosed. Currently, the National Cancer Institute recommends that women over age 40 be screened for breast cancer every one to two years, and that women in that age group with a family history of the illness consult a physician about having more frequent screenings. The American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms for women ages 40 to 50. However, there is no consensus on breast cancer screening recommendations for women in their 30s and early 40s. This report appears in the August issue of Cancer.      RELATED LINKS:      Mammograms Before 50      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,1889.asp      Mammograms and Self-Exams: Two Breast Cancer Weapons      http://onhealth.com/ch1/columnist/item,14249.asp      Jeanne’s Breast Cancer Diary      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,34045.asp      Women Need Yearly Mammograms      http://onhealth.com/ch1/briefs/item,41280.asp

Response:

Victoria wrote in message <37BB68C4.4B54D…@earthlink.net

,

I read these statistics and they line up with others I’ve read in the past

few years.  But I have vivid recall of

keeping a log in 1990 of the number of deaths of patients in our practice

(town of 65,000)  in their 30’s and 40’s who

died the same year from breast cancer.    We lost five  patients that year

alone who were in their 30’s and nine  who

were in their 40’s. I believe six had inflammatory primary tumors which was

unbelievable as it is highly aggressive and

rare.  The same six were diagnosed and died within the same 12 month time

frame.

I left oncology the same year but the women who died and the seemingly high

numbers are still with me.  I don’t even

remember the count for those 50 and up.

 Another one of the current "taboo topics" that never gets mentioned is the use of recreational drugs and birth control pills among younger women. What is going on with this combination. One never sees anything about it, yet alcohol and smoking get some attention as increasing risk factors. What is the story with a generation of women who have used more recreational drugs during their life time than any other generation? J

Victoria ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

Mammograms Advised for Young Women ———————————- Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer every 12 to 18 months because the disease progresses more quickly in younger women than in older women, a team of international researchers says. Researchers led by Dr. Laszlo Tabar of Central Hospital in Falun, Sweden, studied data on more than 77,000 women. They calculated that if women ages 40 to 54 had mammograms once a year, it would reduce mortality by 32 percent, Dr. Tabar says. The research team also points out that, compared to women who are not screened regularly, women who have regular mammograms have smaller tumors that are less likely to spread to other areas of the body at the time breast cancer is diagnosed. Currently, the National Cancer Institute recommends that women over age 40 be screened for breast cancer every one to two years, and that women in that age group with a family history of the illness consult a physician about having more frequent screenings. The American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms for women ages 40 to 50. However, there is no consensus on breast cancer screening recommendations for women in their 30s and early 40s. This report appears in the August issue of Cancer.      RELATED LINKS:      Mammograms Before 50      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,1889.asp      Mammograms and Self-Exams: Two Breast Cancer Weapons      http://onhealth.com/ch1/columnist/item,14249.asp      Jeanne’s Breast Cancer Diary      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,34045.asp      Women Need Yearly Mammograms      http://onhealth.com/ch1/briefs/item,41280.asp

Response:

This is the advice given for the Breast Cancer Screening program here in British Columbia. Mammogram every year age 40 to 50, but every two years after age 50. Not only do pre menopausal breast cancers grow faster, but they are harder to find in dense breasts. On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:11:48 GMT, AneeB…@bigfoot.com (AneeBear) wrote:

This came along with the one on HRT, same goes for this one…except that I have one comment. The title is Mammograms Advised for Young Women…..then the first line says…."Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer….." Does this mean I am not "young" anymore because I am over 50?? frown<

It means you do not need to worry about getting pre menopausal breast cancer. Something to celebrate I think?

AneeBear

Kathryn droz…@home.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mammograms Advised for Young Women ———————————- Women under age 50 should be screened for breast cancer every 12 to 18 months because the disease progresses more quickly in younger women than in older women, a team of international researchers says. Researchers led by Dr. Laszlo Tabar of Central Hospital in Falun, Sweden, studied data on more than 77,000 women. They calculated that if women ages 40 to 54 had mammograms once a year, it would reduce mortality by 32 percent, Dr. Tabar says. The research team also points out that, compared to women who are not screened regularly, women who have regular mammograms have smaller tumors that are less likely to spread to other areas of the body at the time breast cancer is diagnosed. Currently, the National Cancer Institute recommends that women over age 40 be screened for breast cancer every one to two years, and that women in that age group with a family history of the illness consult a physician about having more frequent screenings. The American Cancer Society recommends annual mammograms for women ages 40 to 50. However, there is no consensus on breast cancer screening recommendations for women in their 30s and early 40s. This report appears in the August issue of Cancer.      RELATED LINKS:      Mammograms Before 50      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,1889.asp      Mammograms and Self-Exams: Two Breast Cancer Weapons      http://onhealth.com/ch1/columnist/item,14249.asp      Jeanne’s Breast Cancer Diary      http://onhealth.com/ch1/in-depth/item/item,34045.asp      Women Need Yearly Mammograms      http://onhealth.com/ch1/briefs/item,41280.asp

Response:

In Shock – CFI arrested!

Question:

Re-legalize all drugs and all "drug" crime and violence disappears overnight while we cut our prison population in half. LOL legalize all crimes and all crimes dissappear. brilliant! This 2-second reply of yours makes a nice sound bite, but ignores what was actually being said.

ignores? not really.  I know what was being said.  I’ve heard and full understand the points raised here and previously. actually, I think you’ve missed my point.  That is, to claim that crime is eliminated because it’s now legal isn’t a solution, it’s merely a redefinition and redistribution of the problem. The point is that the black market in drugs is directly caused by the laws

[snip] (sigh)  We don’t agree on cause and effect do we?  The market is caused by the users, not by the law.  The market is a "black market" because it’s illegal (duh), but without the users said "black market" wouldn’t exist anyway. Presently, the cure is worse than the disease,

We disagree.  and I have great confidence that we will continue to disagree. — Bob (I think people can figure out how to email me…) (replace ihatessppaamm with my name (rnoel) and hw1 with mediaone)

Response:

I’ve never advocated legalizing all crimes.  I do think it’s rather silly, however, to make illegal that which harms no one. greg

    Do you really believe what you posted…If so, it must really be nice in your world….

Response:

What the HELL does riding a Harley have to do with being in shock about this? Are all Harley riders druggies or something? Unless you have some kind of justification for that statement that I’m just not seeing, go f*** yourself.

It was just someone’s glib use of a well-known stereotype with the intent of eliciting images of "Hell’s Angels" (apparently still very big up in Canada and currently fighting turf wars with other motorcycle gangs over drug distribution) and suchlike… As long as we are dabbling in stereotypes, it is probably closer to the truth to assert that Harley riders tend to be well-paid professionals nowadays, since they are the only ones who can afford the dang things!! I’m a Honda Pacific Coast rider, personally :-)  Honda slashed the price of the things about $2,000 the year after I bought mine. :-( – Steve All Hail Brak!! Stephen Farris, M2-1/2 Northwestern University Medical School

Response:

Steve, I agree! Well thought out and not an unpopular idea, but what are any of us willing to do to change the current system? Unfortunatly, most will do nothing except hope that it changes on it’s own. We are in a spin. Let talk flying!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The point is that the black market in drugs is directly caused by the laws prohibiting their production and distribution, and that furthermore an entire class of people has been criminalized due to behavior which consists simply of self-administration of mind-altering chemicals. If the first two sets of laws were done away with (production and distribution), then the entire subculture of drug smuggling, pushing and so on would vanish nearly instantaneously.  Additionally, drug production could then be regulated (no more rat poison in the heroin).  The money not being spent on enforcement can now be steered towards P.R. campaigns designed to keep people from taking drugs in the first place, and towards clinics / programs to help them if they need it.

This is quite a naive assumption. Production and distribution of illegal drugs is a profitable business; there is no indication that those who profit from that business will willingly give it up. If drug production and distribution is regulated (and taxed) there will be no incentive to give up illegal production and distribution (which will still be profitable). The money now being spent on enforcement will continue to be spent on enforcement. Note that this step, while not specifically addressing (or by any stretch of the imagination making legal) crimes such as murder, smuggling, contraband weapons possession / use, money laundering, and so on, would have the definite effect of greatly reducing the incidence of these crimes in general.  Cheap drugs simply wouldn’t be worth fighting over.

Much the same arguments could have been made about Prohibition. Unfortunately the demise of the Volstead Act and the re-legalization of alcohol did not result in the end of bootlegging as a major criminal business enterprise. Bootlegging ended when the cost of doing business exceeded the profits and when it simultaneously became too dangerous to continue. That point was not brought about by Federal law enforcement, it was brought about by the actions of U-boats off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.

Response:

Another good point. There have been more lives ruined by drug laws than by drugs. — Mike Regish – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – [snip] Re-legalize all drugs and all "drug" crime and violence disappears overnight while we cut our prison population in half. LOL legalize all crimes and all crimes dissappear. brilliant! — Bob (I think people can figure out how to email me…) (replace ihatessppaamm with my name (rnoel) and hw1 with mediaone)

Response:

[snip] Re-legalize all drugs and all "drug" crime and violence disappears overnight while we cut our prison population in half. LOL legalize all crimes and all crimes dissappear. brilliant!

I’ve never advocated legalizing all crimes.  I do think it’s rather silly, however, to make illegal that which harms no one. greg — gregory travis     |"Video1.0 apparently had a few things that became confusing                    |   flack Mark Murray on its new ActivePerjury innovation

Response:

I’ve never advocated legalizing all crimes.  

acknowledged. I do think it’s rather silly, however, to make illegal that which harms no one.

That drugs are not harmful to anyone is a debatable point. — Bob (I think people can figure out how to email me…) (replace ihatessppaamm with my name (rnoel) and hw1 with mediaone)

Response:

What an understated response… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What the HELL does riding a Harley have to do with being in shock about this? Are all Harley riders druggies or something? Unless you have some kind of justification for that statement that I’m just not seeing, go f*** yourself. — Mike Regish You ride harleys and your in shock that someone would do this?

Response:

Because he had to go crawling around in the dregs to look for drugs… — Mike Regish

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Come with me next time I have to tell a loving mother that her teenage son just had his brains blown out on the corner.

Response:

You people??  Who people?  I happen to live in the inner city.  Don’t make off the cuff assumtions about others based on your personal view of the world you will find you are wrong most of the time. idea how violent. The junkie then finds your wife at the local mall and sticks a gun in her face. Her life means nothing to a junkie in search of a blast. And a bank robber sticking a gun in the face of a teller is somehow

Bank robbery is actually a "docile crime" by violent crime standards. Notes are used in most bank robberies. Displayed weapons are rare (it tends to draw attention to the robber). less evil than this?  What world do you live in?

My world— I’ve lived in the city for40 years. I’m an 18 year Baltimore City Police Officer. -Twelve  years as a uniformed patrol officer in one of the busiest police districts in the country. -Four years in a drug enforcement unit. -Two years in a major crimes unit. I deal with those suffering from drug addition on a daily basis. I also deal with their victims. I have to work with the understanding that the corner junkie who smiles wants to talk to me about last night’s basketball game would kill me or you without thought if the "rock"calls. We had more than 300 murders and over 2,000 shootings last year in a city of approx. 650,000 people. There are "countries" that we would consider dangerous that don’t have the violent crime rates equal to that of some of our cities. The vast majority were drug related. We have more than 50,000 heroin addicts in our city and lord knows how many cocaine addicts. Do the math! Addiction experts in our city est. that one in eight city residents are addicted to at least one of the "big two" ( drugs). How do these people get their money? No, it’s not the pot smoking high school kid.   Come with me next time I have to tell a loving mother that her teenage son just had his brains blown out on the corner.   Come help me scrape (literally) up the hooker who died of an OD months earlier in the basement of a vacant house.   Help me carry a neglected child  from a rat infested basement while the parents are passed out on the floor with a needle in their arms.  I’ve had two people try to kill me and I’ve lost several friends over the years. One friend (not a police officer) was   found dead inside her workplace. A heroin addict robbed, raped and sodomized her. I was one of the responding officers. My wife was robbed at gun point while at work (also by an addict). No-they were not your "High School" pot smokers. Have I learned to hate? No — I’ve learned to respect the power of addiction.  Shock gave way to acceptance–which gave way to discust–which gave way to fear for my friends and loved ones. Some have a name for people who live in the "inner city" with their heads in the sand…… Future Statistics. Don’t make off the cuff assumtions about others based on your personal view.

I don’t think my "personal view" has been "off the cuff". I’ve had a front row seat. Stay safe my friend!   And pray that an officer never has to knock on your door.

Response:

I’ve never advocated legalizing all crimes.   acknowledged. I do think it’s rather silly, however, to make illegal that which harms no one. That drugs are not harmful to anyone is a debatable point.

There is no need for debate, really.  It is an accepted FACT that some people cause direct injury to themselves through drug use, that some people cause direct harm to other people and property while under the influence of drugs, and that some people cause indirect harm to others by breaking up families, trading assets for drugs, and so on. It is for this reason that I heartily support drug education programs (though I would vastly prefer HONEST ones — not things like "Reefer Madness") and addiction clinics for the inevitable FEW who get hopelessly / detrimentally hooked (note that having a drug habit does not in and of itself necessarily incapacitate you or make you a danger to other people). Should the HARMLESS use of mind-altering drugs be legal?  Yes.  Why do you want the government to have power over your choices?  Keep in mind that anything that is CRIMINAL is ultimately dealt with by force (of arms, if necessary). Should reckless endangerment of others due to the operation of a motor vehicle, heavy equipment, and so on while under the impairing influence of any mind-altering chemical be legal?  No.  In general, I believe that current DUI laws are too lax and that enforcement is also too lax. Should I be able to blow pot smoke in someone’s face?  No.  Should I be able to blow cigarette smoke in someone’s face?  No.  Should I be able to pour my beer in someone’s mouth?  No.  Should I be able to put these things into my body in the privacy of my own home?  Yes.  With other consenting adults present?  Yes.  In a public establishment recognized for that purpose?  Yes.   I can drink in a bar if I want to.  Why can’t I establish a "pot bar" where consenting adults can hang out and smoke marijuana? Rock climbing causes harm to people.  Usually, the person harmed by the act of climbing rocks is the climber, but if I intentionally drive my piton into your leg, I should be prosecuted for assault.  If I climb without permission on your property I should be prosecuted for trespass.  In neither case should I be prosecuted for the crime of "rock climbing". Aerobatic flying causes harm to people.  Usually, the person harmedby the act of flying aerobatically is the pilot, but if I dive bomb your house and pour napalm on the roof, I should be prosecuted for God only knows what…arson, reckless endangerment, blah blah blah.  If I steal your airplane to perform aerobatics, I should be prosecuted for theft.  In neither case should I be prosecuted for the crime of "aerobatic flying". Driving causes harm to people.  Often, the person harmed IS NOT THE DRIVER, BUT IT IS STILL LEGAL TO DRIVE.  Still, if I drive "while under the influence", I should be prosecuted for DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE.  If I drive an unsafe / illegally polluting vehicle, I should be prosecuted specifically for operating an unsafe or polluting vehicle.  In neither case should I be prosecuted simply for the crime of "driving". You can deduce the big finish… Drug use causes harm to people.  Usually, the person harmed by the act of taking drugs is the drug user, but if I rob you to get money to buy drugs, I should prosecuted for robbery, assault and so on as applicable.  If I drive under the influence of said drugs, I should be prosecuted for driving under the influence.  In neither case should I be prosecuted simply for the crime of "drug use". The actions that cause harm to other people or their property are already illegal.  It is not necessary to extend the government’s influence to making personal choices illegal, when the possible detrimental side effects of choices that are, in and of themselves, harmless to others, are already dealt with in the law. – Steve All Hail Brak!! Stephen Farris, M2-1/2 Northwestern University Medical School

Response:

[snip] Re-legalize all drugs and all "drug" crime and violence disappears overnight while we cut our prison population in half. LOL legalize all crimes and all crimes dissappear. brilliant!

This 2-second reply of yours makes a nice sound bite, but ignores what was actually being said. The point is that the black market in drugs is directly caused by the laws prohibiting their production and distribution, and that furthermore an entire class of people has been criminalized due to behavior which consists simply of self-administration of mind-altering chemicals. If the first two sets of laws were done away with (production and distribution), then the entire subculture of drug smuggling, pushing and so on would vanish nearly instantaneously.  Additionally, drug production could then be regulated (no more rat poison in the heroin).  The money not being spent on enforcement can now be steered towards P.R. campaigns designed to keep people from taking drugs in the first place, and towards clinics / programs to help them if they need it. Note that this step, while not specifically addressing (or by any stretch of the imagination making legal) crimes such as murder, smuggling, contraband weapons possession / use, money laundering, and so on, would have the definite effect of greatly reducing the incidence of these crimes in general.  Cheap drugs simply wouldn’t be worth fighting over. If the set of laws criminalizing drug possession and use were eliminated, then the ridiculous number of drug users sent to prison, put on probation, fined, dispossessed (should law enforcement really be able to profit by taking your boat away from you and selling it because they found a bong and some weed on it?) or otherwise encumbered by the law would indeed cease to be a criminal class.  This is the direct effect that you allude to in your glib statement. These laws do NOT encompass "all crimes" by any means.  To wit, crimes such as robbery, murder, rape, theft, breaking and entering, assault and battery would clearly continue to be crimes, but I GUARANTEE you that the incidence of these crimes would drop as a direct effect of the legalization and resultant safe and sane distribution of drugs. What people MUST keep in mind during debates such as these is the question:   Exactly what is being proposed?  The proposition is to decriminalize the production, distribution, sale and use of presently controlled substances.   This pointedly does NOT include:  making DUI legal (where the "I" is the "Influence" of ANY mind-altering substance [at least to the point where some critical function is being impaired -- people don't usually worry about caffeine and nicotine]); making distribution to minors legal; making it "socially acceptable" to use drugs — indeed, as stated above much of the enforcement money could be shifted to drug awareness programs and abuse clinics. Presently, the cure is worse than the disease, and it is destroying our Constitution. – Steve All Hail Brak!! Stephen Farris, M2-1/2 Northwestern University Medical School

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Drugs worse than bank robbery?  Hrmmm, robbing a bank directly threatens and potentially kills a random human being (presumably the teller and any other spectators).  Drug running harms the drug runner (if he gets caught) and presumably the person who later chooses to purchase and use the drugs (not so innocent)   Which would you say is worse? The drug user of course! Bank robbers rarely injure their victims while drug users account for most of the violent crime in this country. The problem is that most see drug use from their perspective (" pot never hurt anyone"). The brutal truth is that our prisons are full of violent offenders who have one thing in common……DRUGS. Yes we could legalize and control– it may work. Yes we could sink money into treatment instead of enforcement, but the asshole who sneaks cocaine or heroin into this country is only serving himself. Most go to the inner city where a violent sub-culture exsists. You people have no idea how violent. The junkie then finds your wife at the local mall and sticks a gun in her face. Her life means nothing to a junkie in search of a blast.

That’s total crap.  "drug users account for must of the violent crime in this country."  I’m a "drug user," as I take both alcohol and caffeine.  I married a "drug user" (caffeine and nicotine) and both my parents were "drug users" (caffeine, nicotine, alcohol).  None of us has ever committed a violent crime in our lives.  In fact, I don’t personally know any "drug users" that have committed a violent crime even though most of my friends, acquaintances, etc. are "drug users." No "drugs" with which I am familiar make ordinarily non-violent people violent (with the possible exception of alcohol but, even with alcohol, the majority of users do not become violent).  In fact, even among the arbitrarily-illegal drugs like LSD, marijuana, and heroin, there is no correllation with violence. Crime and violence, however, are highly correllated.  Violence exists among drug users only because drugs are illegal which pushes their street cost far about their production cost.  That creates a black market where everyone violently competes for a share of the hurricane of money. Re-legalize all drugs and all "drug" crime and violence disappears overnight while we cut our prison population in half. It’s just that simple. greg — gregory travis     |"Video1.0 apparently had a few things that became confusing                    |   flack Mark Murray on its new ActivePerjury innovation

Response:

[snip] Re-legalize all drugs and all "drug" crime and violence disappears overnight while we cut our prison population in half.

LOL legalize all crimes and all crimes dissappear. brilliant! — Bob (I think people can figure out how to email me…) (replace ihatessppaamm with my name (rnoel) and hw1 with mediaone)

Response:

"who sneaks cocaine or heroin into this country is only serving himself.

Most go to the inner city where a violent sub-culture exsists. You people have no idea how violent. The junkie then finds your wife at the local mall and sticks a gun in her face"<< Only because drugs are illegal. The "war on drugs" is tearing the country apart, not the drugs. KG

Response:

What the HELL does riding a Harley have to do with being in shock about this? Are all Harley riders druggies or something? Unless you have some kind of justification for that statement that I’m just not seeing, go f*** yourself. — Mike Regish – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – You ride harleys and your in shock that someone would do this?

Response:

Drugs worse than bank robbery?  Hrmmm, robbing a bank directly threatens and potentially kills a random human being (presumably the teller and any other spectators).  Drug running harms the drug runner (if he gets caught) and presumably the person who later chooses to purchase and use the drugs (not so innocent)   Which would you say is worse?

The drug user of course! Bank robbers rarely injure their victims while drug users account for most of the violent crime in this country. The problem is that most see drug use from their perspective (" pot never hurt anyone"). The brutal truth is that our prisons are full of violent offenders who have one thing in common……DRUGS. Yes we could legalize and control– it may work. Yes we could sink money into treatment instead of enforcement, but the asshole who sneaks cocaine or heroin into this country is only serving himself. Most go to the inner city where a violent sub-culture exsists. You people have no idea how violent. The junkie then finds your wife at the local mall and sticks a gun in her face. Her life means nothing to a junkie in search of a blast. I worked with then for a long time.  

Response:

I don’t know if he did it for the money but I was at his home a few times and he lived well.  I attributed this to the big bucks he was getting as an Ag. pilto here.  Who knows now, he might have had a *BIG* nest egg that he was living on. You ride harleys and your in shock that someone would do this? The cheap wages that these FBO’s pay flight instructors it is no wonder to me that this idiot took the opportunity to fly some drugs. I think he should be shot because they were drugs; he should have stuck to bank robbery or some other honest vocation.

– Live To Ride…Ride To Live!—–AND FLY TOO!  (Brand New Private Pilot) 1993 Harley-Davidson XLH883 Sportster 1997 Suzuki DR350SE

Response:

Drugs worse than bank robbery?  Hrmmm, robbing a bank directly threatens and potentially kills a random human being (presumably the teller and any other spectators).  Drug running harms the drug runner (if he gets caught) and presumably the person who later chooses to purchase and use the drugs (not so innocent)   Which would you say is worse? The drug user of course! Bank robbers rarely injure their victims while drug users account for most of the violent crime in this country. The problem is that most see drug use from their perspective (" pot never hurt anyone"). The brutal truth is that our prisons are full of violent offenders who have one thing in common……DRUGS.

Dont be an idiot, anyone who robs a bank is FAR more outside the bounds of civilised society than a pot smoking high schooler. Yes we could legalize and control– it may work. Yes we could sink money into treatment instead of enforcement, but the asshole who sneaks cocaine or heroin into this country is only serving himself. Most go to the inner city where a violent sub-culture exsists. You people have no

You people??  Who people?  I happen to live in the inner city.  Don’t make off the cuff assumtions about others based on your personal view of the world you will find you are wrong most of the time. idea how violent. The junkie then finds your wife at the local mall and sticks a gun in her face. Her life means nothing to a junkie in search of a blast.

And a bank robber sticking a gun in the face of a teller is somehow less evil than this?  What world do you live in?

Response:

I am in shock. I just found out that my CFI here in Visalia, CA was arrested last week in Ft. Lauderdale, FL for drug running and some other charges pending since 1995.  I can’t believe it!  I am just glad I got my license before it happened.  I liked the guy and he really seemed to care about his students and his cropdusting job.  What really upsets me is that I am in the Navy and he was a former Marine.  I had respect and admiration for him being a verteran of the service, now he brings shame to the service as a whole.  Hopefully, this type of thing doesn’t happen too often. Time to look for another CFI! — Live To Ride…Ride To Live!—–AND FLY TOO!  (Brand New Private Pilot) 1993 Harley-Davidson XLH883 Sportster 1997 Suzuki DR350SE

Response:

WOW!  Never heard of such a thing.  More proof that CFI’s should make more money… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am in shock. I just found out that my CFI here in Visalia, CA was arrested last week in Ft. Lauderdale, FL for drug running and some other

Response:

You ride harleys and your in shock that someone would do this? The cheap wages that these FBO’s pay flight instructors it is no wonder to me that this idiot took the opportunity to fly some drugs. I think he should be shot because they were drugs; he should have stuck to bank robbery or some other honest vocation.

Response:

The cheap wages that these FBO’s pay flight instructors it is no wonder to me that this idiot took the opportunity to fly some drugs. I think he should be shot because they were drugs; he should have stuck to bank robbery or some other honest vocation.

Drugs worse than bank robbery?  Hrmmm, robbing a bank directly threatens and potentially kills a random human being (presumably the teller and any other spectators).  Drug running harms the drug runner (if he gets caught) and presumably the person who later chooses to purchase and use the drugs (not so innocent)   Which would you say is worse? tim(not a drug runner)F

Response:

Are you certain this CFI could sign you off? Mike – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am in shock. I just found out that my CFI here in Visalia, CA was arrested last week in Ft. Lauderdale, FL for drug running and some other charges pending since 1995.  I can’t believe it!  I am just glad I got my license before it happened.  I liked the guy and he really seemed to care about his students and his cropdusting job.  What really upsets me is that I am in the Navy and he was a former Marine.  I had respect and admiration for him being a verteran of the service, now he brings shame to the service as a whole.  Hopefully, this type of thing doesn’t happen too often. Time to look for another CFI! — Live To Ride…Ride To Live!—–AND FLY TOO!  (Brand New Private Pilot) 1993 Harley-Davidson XLH883 Sportster 1997 Suzuki DR350SE

Response: