Objectivity
Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -SL wrote:
Hi, Some responses to your message, see* Granny —– Original Message —– From: "Neal Feldman" <silverst…@home.net Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.parent i ng.spanking,misc.kids,misc.legal Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 12:00 PM Subject: Re: Objectivity SL wrote: Hi folks, I’ve been following your newsgroup for some time. I, too, believe that CPS needs to be and MUST be reformed, if not abolished. Yup! And since it clearly will never be able to be significantly and substantively reformed legitimately and credibly (see the experience in Oregon circa 1991-present) absolute elimination is called for. HOWEVER, I do not believe in some of your statistics and narrow-mindedness. You can choose to disbelieve the truth and claim accuracy as narrowmindedness all you like. Your claims, however, do not make it so. I do believe that extreme circumstances take extreme measures to be corrected. Extreme as defined as violating the civil, constitutional, human, due process and parental rights of the citizenry? Extreme as defined as kidnapping children from innocent parents and families? THAT kind of extreme, huh? *Yes, I agree. The impoundment of children as if they were less than potted plants is bizarre and extreme.
Glad you agree.
I do know that most of the children removed from parents are in danger of abuse if not neglected and abused directly. Where do you get this from, considering all the credible and legitimate facts and evidence clearly and conclusively quite the opposite… that only 5-10% or so of removals are in fact legitimately warranted… which is to say that 90-95% or more ARE NOT. *Since there are no TRUE and accurate facts available from the agencies, we will not be able to have access to meaningful statistics.
Sorry but the evidence and facts and data are available, and from Gestapo CPS itself as well as the CDC, HHS and a myriad other sources, as well as enough first hand experience by many individuals related which are eerily consistent to adjust the selfserving figures of Gestapo CPS towards the truth. (Gestapo CPS admits that 65-70% are false, however anyone who has been involved in the system knows that they ‘find as founded’ a large number of cases where no objective and sane person with any common sense at all would have been able to… they even TPR when there has been absolutely no real and substantive evidence of any ACTUAL child abuse or criminal child neglect. Most of their ‘cases’ are based on nothing but ‘risks’ as determined by rabidly anti-parent, anti-male and anti-family paranoid undertrained and overobsessed bureaucrats on a rampaging agenda kick and in search of personal power trips and/or additional funding streams. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Since when is 5-10% ‘most’, hmmmmm? I do know that many children are removed during what I know to be unconstitutional grounds and that the secrecy afforded to the caseworkers is abhorrent and illegal on the merits of the issues. Absolutely! I know this: One cannot "reunite" a child with a drug addict who fails and refuses to stop the abusive chemicals and lifestyle. One who fails to complete all rehabilitation efforts paid for by the state and provided by the agencies and courts. No one is saying one should. I guess, though, you would have to define ‘drug addict’ and ‘abusive chemicals and lifestyle’. I have seen children kidnapped because the parent smoked a joint once or twice a week, was never abusive to the child, paid the bills, had a nice home, etc. Do you consider alcohol a drug? Would someone who regularly has a glass of wine with dinner or a beer during a football game be considered a ‘drug addict’ under these definitions? Do you consider tobacco a drug? Would any and all smokers be considered ‘drug addicts’ under your definitions? Do you consider caffeine a drug? Would all drinkers of coffee, tea and Mountain Dew be considered ‘drug addicts’ under your definitions? Would any of these substances be considered ‘abusive’ by you? If so, why? If not, why not? *No, and I agree with you.
Thank you.
Those of us who have been exposed to an addict’s "lifestyle" know what is meant by this. It’s no place that even the addict really wants to be. I mean destructive addictions to chemicals that kill your brain and destroy your spirit like crystal methamphetamine addiction can do. Living in a filthy car and stealing for your next high. Forgetting that you have a child in your care and not feeding her.
Clearly in those cases, but those cases are in all honesty and insignificant minority of the cases of action by Gestapo CPS, and such cases do not excuse the vast majority of actions by Gestapo CPS which are nothing less than crimes against humanity.
I share your beliefs regarding others claiming "abuse" for those who choose to smoke and drink and remain capable and responsible for caring for their children.
How about those who use OTHER drugs yet remain capable and responsible for caring for their children? Alcohol and tobacco are drugs just like any other, and have ruined lives, killed,etc just like any other. Why do you elevate them to some honored status above other drugs, especially since they contribute to more harm and death in society than all other drugs COMBINED? (actually I think EITHER of them SEPARATELY do so!)
One cannot return a child to it’s mother who is mentally ill and refuses any and all treatment for the problems. A mother who threatens suicide and murder for the baby. In the latter case I would agree with you. Clearly so. However in your first statement I have seen people defined in court as ‘mentally ill’ because they considered Gestapo CPS and the Child Abuse and Kidnapping Industry as offensive and harmful to their children, them and their family and were ‘uncooperative’ with their own victimization. Would this fall into the category of ‘mentally ill’ under your definitions? What WOULD the parameters of such be, in fact? Please be very specific if you would, ok? *I mean fully diagnosed with mental illness that is a real condition.
Many ‘conditions’ listed in DSM-IV are fully diagnosed and actual real conditions. One of the most common is, for example, depression. So you are then claiming that any parent who has ever been diagnosted with even mild depression should have their children kidnapped from them because this somehow ‘proves them unfit as parents’? Are you serious?
*I understand that CPS makes it’s own diagnosis of illness after they torture family members and children etc.
Yes they do. They put people under stress then fault them for being under stress. They do things which would anger a Saint and then fault the parents for being angry and say that the parents are a ‘risk’ to the children because of this and should go to ‘anger management classes’. Heck, the fact that most parents to date have yet to rip apart Gestapo CPS socialwreckers with their bare hands is a testament to the fact they DO NOT NEED anger management classes, they are managing their anger quite admirably. Try stepping between a mother grizzly bear and her cub and see how long you last.
It’s a very difficult problem. A parent who is addicted to crystal methamphetamine, for instance, one who injects an unborn with the substances prior to delivery and by proximity thereafter is guilty of a crime of abuse and certainly not able to care for a child. Are you saying she took a long needle and injected the fetus through the uterine wall? *Injected into the unborn’s system.
That is not injected… that is presented for absorption. Different. Less inflammatory.
The baby consumed all of the chemicals and has been damaged for life. I cared for this baby and anyone who has cared for a substance exposed infant knows what it is like. A 24/7 job for at least two responsible loving adults. It is awful what is being done to little humans due to the substance exposure by their mommy dearests.
I do not condone such activities while pregnant, and hold that if brought to term and live birth a mother should be held responsible for her actions during pregnancy. This would also include from tobacco and alcohol, damage caused by her continuing to job 20 miles a day when she knew she was pregnant, etc. But again if she has cleaned up and is responsible there is no reason for preventing reunification. And what about cases where the drugs were doctor prescribed and supervised and where there was no harm shown to the child? (Nehmo’s case). Where is the justification?
CPS did nothing for this child but cause her more grief and damage.
Not surprising… generally speaking in the vast majority of cases that is typical.
What the heck do you mean ‘inject by proximity’? What one injects into one’s body is irrelevant to whether or not they are able to care for a child. What would matter would be the effects. If they are a stone addict and their ACTIONS are extremely neglectful or abusive, then yes, I would agree with you. If their ACTIONS are in fact NOT neglectful or abusive (granted this would be rare with a severe meth addict) then where is any legitimacy to your beef? *Again, I am speaking of a chronic meth addict who is also an alcoholic and mentally ill.
Again you will need to define ‘mentally ill’ especially as separate from the other two categories you mention which you have described in detail in the first case and which is pretty much understood generally in the second. The mentally ill label however is not specific enough since there is likely not a single human on the planet who has at one time or another not been diagnosable with SOMETHING out of DSM-IV… which is why the … read more »
Response:
SL wrote:
Hi folks, I’ve been following your newsgroup for some time. I, too, believe that CPS needs to be and MUST be reformed, if not abolished.
Yup! And since it clearly will never be able to be significantly and substantively reformed legitimately and credibly (see the experience in Oregon circa 1991-present) absolute elimination is called for.
HOWEVER, I do not believe in some of your statistics and narrow-mindedness.
You can choose to disbelieve the truth and claim accuracy as narrowmindedness all you like. Your claims, however, do not make it so.
I do believe that extreme circumstances take extreme measures to be corrected.
Extreme as defined as violating the civil, constitutional, human, due process and parental rights of the citizenry? Extreme as defined as kidnapping children from innocent parents and families? THAT kind of extreme, huh?
I do know that most of the children removed from parents are in danger of abuse if not neglected and abused directly.
Where do you get this from, considering all the credible and legitimate facts and evidence clearly and conclusively quite the opposite… that only 5-10% or so of removals are in fact legitimately warranted… which is to say that 90-95% or more ARE NOT. Since when is 5-10% ‘most’, hmmmmm?
I do know that many children are removed during what I know to be unconstitutional grounds and that the secrecy afforded to the caseworkers is abhorrent and illegal on the merits of the issues.
Absolutely!
I know this: One cannot "reunite" a child with a drug addict who fails and refuses to stop the abusive chemicals and lifestyle. One who fails to complete all rehabilitation efforts paid for by the state and provided by the agencies and courts.
No one is saying one should. I guess, though, you would have to define ‘drug addict’ and ‘abusive chemicals and lifestyle’. I have seen children kidnapped because the parent smoked a joint once or twice a week, was never abusive to the child, paid the bills, had a nice home, etc. Do you consider alcohol a drug? Would someone who regularly has a glass of wine with dinner or a beer during a football game be considered a ‘drug addict’ under these definitions? Do you consider tobacco a drug? Would any and all smokers be considered ‘drug addicts’ under your definitions? Do you consider caffeine a drug? Would all drinkers of coffee, tea and Mountain Dew be considered ‘drug addicts’ under your definitions? Would any of these substances be considered ‘abusive’ by you? If so, why? If not, why not?
One cannot return a child to it’s mother who is mentally ill and refuses any and all treatment for the problems. A mother who threatens suicide and murder for the baby.
In the latter case I would agree with you. Clearly so. However in your first statement I have seen people defined in court as ‘mentally ill’ because they considered Gestapo CPS and the Child Abuse and Kidnapping Industry as offensive and harmful to their children, them and their family and were ‘uncooperative’ with their own victimization. Would this fall into the category of ‘mentally ill’ under your definitions? What WOULD the parameters of such be, in fact? Please be very specific if you would, ok?
It’s a very difficult problem. A parent who is addicted to crystal methamphetamine, for instance, one who injects an unborn with the substances prior to delivery and by proximity thereafter is guilty of a crime of abuse and certainly not able to care for a child.
Are you saying she took a long needle and injected the fetus through the uterine wall? What the heck do you mean ‘inject by proximity’? What one injects into one’s body is irrelevant to whether or not they are able to care for a child. What would matter would be the effects. If they are a stone addict and their ACTIONS are extremely neglectful or abusive, then yes, I would agree with you. If their ACTIONS are in fact NOT neglectful or abusive (granted this would be rare with a severe meth addict) then where is any legitimacy to your beef?
I am a certified "child boarding home" and foster parent. Not for any other reason than that I am trying to spring my granddaughters from foster care where they have languished and one has been sexually assaulted allegedly) - for the past four and a half years.
And you hope this will do what?
I hesitate to speak out against agencies for child "protection" because of their very real ability to retaliate. And retaliate, they do.
Absolutely!
Freely and without subjecting themselves to any punitive measures.
Absolutely! Which only promotes such heinous and offensive abuses. Sometimes it seems as if it is not only condoned but in fact actively ENCOURAGED … maybe as a policy to pacify the populace with fear.
They enjoy their "immunity" and secrecy.
Yes they do, and such should be abolished very soon… their abuses of it have made more than enough evidence to justify such removal. And in all honesty once they no longer have their unconstitutional immunity to hide behind one would think their abuses would at least slow significantly… through attrition of those who do not stop being sued and criminally convicted for their wrongdoing, and through the more intelligent and circumspect of them realizing their crimes will no longer be tolerated.
There are currently over four million grandchildren in the care and custody of their grandparents and the majority of this is due to the adult children, the parents of these little ones, being substances abusers and prison inmates.
Well, can’t help much on the prison inmates except that the largest majority of those are victims of the illconceived, abysmally failed and heinously draconian War on Some Drugs. Do away with that and grant amnesty to its victims and a great deal of that particular problem will vanish overnight.
Many of us caregiving relatives agree with many of your positions and opinions of what needs be changed with our CPS "system".
As well you should, because the facts and evidence clearly and conclusively prove me to be accurate and right.
I sure would appreciate it if you folks that are narrow about some aspects of this issue would include the facts of some dire matters regarding little ones being brought into this world addicted and abused prior to birth and thereafter who NEED help and care. Who are dying at the hands of their parents.
Again neither I nor most of the regular opponents in the ngs to Gestapo CPS and the Child Abuse and Kidnapping Industry deny that real and actual child abuse and criminal child neglect occur. What we disagree with is the ludicrously expanded definitions of ‘child abuse’ and ‘child neglect’ far beyond any realm of reason or sanity or common sense. What we disagree with is the claim that Gestapo CPS is ‘needed’ when in fact it is not and in fact does far more harm than it ever has done good, in an order of magnitude or more. What we disagree with is the systematic violations of the civil, constitutional, human, due process and parental rights of the citizenry in the pursuit of a rabidly anti-parent, anti-male, anti-family (and ultimately anti-child) extremist leftist agenda. What we disagree with is the violators being protected from legitimate recourse against them for their wrongdoing (civil and criminal action) by unconstitutional immunities in violation of the 14th amendment to the US Constitution. What we disagree with is the unfounded, discredited and disproven propaganda of the fascist apologists and advocates that there is this ‘epidemic’ of child abuse and criminal child neglect when in fact nothing of the sort is legitimately proven. Expanding the definition of ‘child abuse’ to include calling for your child from your driveway does not in fact make such action actual child abuse.
Please be objective,
I always am. I am entirely objective and founded on the facts and evidence. It is the Gestapo CPS apologists who practice manipulation, twisting, misrepresentation, critical thinking flaws, logical fallacies, dishonesty, paranoia, delusion, and emotionalistic, inflammatory, hysterical and hyperbolic propaganda in their arguments, which is why their arguments are rarely, if ever, relevant, legitimate or credible.
it would help if those of us who agree with so much of your problems, including the unjust removal of children from fit parents, could join in your respected efforts. We care. I care. ~Granny
Glad to hear it, and you are more than invited to join in the righteous war against Gestapo CPS and the Child Abuse and Kidnapping Industry. They declared this war when they declared war on The Family, The Constitution, and all the civil, constitutional, human, due process and parental rights of the citizenry. But while they declared the war, they will not win it, and they are losing it more quickly every year now that the truth is getting out. — ============================================================= Home Page: http://members.home.net/silverstorm/ We will never rest until Gestapo CPS is completely abolished!
Categories: