State of the Union
Question:
Just in case you miss it: (Robo-clapping between each buzzword omitted for the sake of brevity) 2006 Budget Accomplishments Accountability Afghanistan African-American Al Queda Alternative Energy Axis of Evil Blame Game Brave Soldiers Bring terrorists to justice Bringing liberty Broad support Changed world Coalition Common good Compassion Compassionate Conservatism Compete Continued commitment Corporate scandals Creating jobs Cut and Run Dangerous times Death Tax Defend America Defend marriage Democracy Dictator(s) Duty of all Americans Economic Growth Economy Educational opportunity Election Election Reform Eliminate terrorist safe havens Encourage investment Encourage liberty Encourage production Enduring values Equality and justice Evildoers Expanding economy Extreme Islamic Fundamentalists Extremism Face a future Faith FEMA Fight them there Force for good Forces of terror Freedom Freedom from fear Frontiers of freedom Fuel Prices Gasoline Good people Got ‘em on the run Great opportunity Greatest purpose Hamas Hard work Health care reform Heck of a Job Higher standards Historical Times Hold us back Homeland Security Hope Hot on their trail Hurricane Katrina IEDs Illegal Immigrants Increase (our) production Innovative spirit Insurgency Intelligence Iraq Iraqi Democracy Iraqi Freedom Iraqi Vote Jobs of the future Korea Level the playing field Liberal Liberated millions Liberty Lobbyists Marriage Medicare reform Medicare/Medicaid Military Families Modernize Moral responsibility Morality National energy policy Nine Eleven No Child Left Behind Not discriminate against NSA Nuclear proliferation Our Allies Our children Our commitments Our grandchildren Ownership Palestinian Pandemic Peaceful Society Personal accounts Productivity Prosperity Protect our border Protect the environment Protect the homeland Public service Rebuild Reform Religious Renew again Resolve is needed Resolve Prosperity Rewrite History Rogue nations Sacrifice Saddam Hussein Safe Sanctity/Peace Senior Citizens Sept. 11 Shake our will Share Shut down their financing Social Security Stay the Course Struggle Students Supporting our troops Sustained progress Tax Relief Tell(ing) the truth Terrorist Cells Terrorist Surveillance Program Terrorist(s) The Democrats Threat of nuclear Tough road ahead Training camps Transform Troops Uncertainty and weakness Undermining our Efforts Unemployment Values Veterans Victory Vision that guides us War on terror Weapons of Mass Destruction Win(ning) Wisdom Withdrawal WMDs Working families
Response:
Forgot the "OT"- sorry…..
Response:
To bring this on topic by borrowing from the band name generator thread: Holy Lyin’ Bush It’s Just a Goddamned Piece of Funk Nucular Vulture WMD Preacher and the Relief Shameful Evil-Doers and the Ghetto Towel Embodied Good Job Brownie and the Rusty Bazooka Abramoff Payday and the Fury Gas Prices Zero and the Consequence I’m an Idiot and the Begging Lassie
Response:
To bring this on topic by borrowing from the band name generator thread: Holy Lyin’ Bush It’s Just a Goddamned Piece of Funk Nucular Vulture WMD Preacher and the Relief Shameful Evil-Doers and the Ghetto Towel Embodied Good Job Brownie and the Rusty Bazooka Abramoff Payday and the Fury Gas Prices Zero and the Consequence I’m an Idiot and the Begging Lassie
Here’s a better angle should you feel so inclined:
rtsp://video.c-span.org/15days/e013006_policy.rm
Response:
I’ve grown to find his "Workin’ HARD" line to rank RIGHT up there with a kid’s "you know?" or the ubiquitous "know what I mean?". Ashcroft Powell Tenet Libby The air is merely leaking out of the neocon balloon at a faster rate now. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just in case you miss it: (Robo-clapping between each buzzword omitted for the sake of brevity) 2006 Budget Accomplishments Accountability Afghanistan African-American Al Queda Alternative Energy Axis of Evil Blame Game Brave Soldiers Bring terrorists to justice Bringing liberty Broad support Changed world Coalition Common good Compassion Compassionate Conservatism Compete Continued commitment Corporate scandals Creating jobs Cut and Run Dangerous times Death Tax Defend America Defend marriage Democracy Dictator(s) Duty of all Americans Economic Growth Economy Educational opportunity Election Election Reform Eliminate terrorist safe havens Encourage investment Encourage liberty Encourage production Enduring values Equality and justice Evildoers Expanding economy Extreme Islamic Fundamentalists Extremism Face a future Faith FEMA Fight them there Force for good Forces of terror Freedom Freedom from fear Frontiers of freedom Fuel Prices Gasoline Good people Got ‘em on the run Great opportunity Greatest purpose Hamas Hard work Health care reform Heck of a Job Higher standards Historical Times Hold us back Homeland Security Hope Hot on their trail Hurricane Katrina IEDs Illegal Immigrants Increase (our) production Innovative spirit Insurgency Intelligence Iraq Iraqi Democracy Iraqi Freedom Iraqi Vote Jobs of the future Korea Level the playing field Liberal Liberated millions Liberty Lobbyists Marriage Medicare reform Medicare/Medicaid Military Families Modernize Moral responsibility Morality National energy policy Nine Eleven No Child Left Behind Not discriminate against NSA Nuclear proliferation Our Allies Our children Our commitments Our grandchildren Ownership Palestinian Pandemic Peaceful Society Personal accounts Productivity Prosperity Protect our border Protect the environment Protect the homeland Public service Rebuild Reform Religious Renew again Resolve is needed Resolve Prosperity Rewrite History Rogue nations Sacrifice Saddam Hussein Safe Sanctity/Peace Senior Citizens Sept. 11 Shake our will Share Shut down their financing Social Security Stay the Course Struggle Students Supporting our troops Sustained progress Tax Relief Tell(ing) the truth Terrorist Cells Terrorist Surveillance Program Terrorist(s) The Democrats Threat of nuclear Tough road ahead Training camps Transform Troops Uncertainty and weakness Undermining our Efforts Unemployment Values Veterans Victory Vision that guides us War on terror Weapons of Mass Destruction Win(ning) Wisdom Withdrawal WMDs Working families
Response:
I’ve often thought- *IF* there was _one_ event where the U.S. Government was gathered in one physical place and the entire event was covered live by the media… Security can only be *so* good when it comes to technology and terrorism. Fact? Post 9/11/01, it’s an arrogant, stupid anachronism to do it the way it’s always been done, right there on the Senate Floor, before live TV -really _stupid_. …but isn’t that *the* very nature of "Conservatism"? Keeping things ‘unchanged’? If I’ve thought it, there’s unknown tens of thousands with the means and motive who have as well. Dumb assed blind traditionalists. The nature of nature is itself, change -and they fight it. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve grown to find his "Workin’ HARD" line to rank RIGHT up there with a kid’s "you know?" or the ubiquitous "know what I mean?". Ashcroft Powell Tenet Libby The air is merely leaking out of the neocon balloon at a faster rate now.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve often thought- *IF* there was _one_ event where the U.S. Government was gathered in one physical place and the entire event was covered live by the media… Security can only be *so* good when it comes to technology and terrorism. Fact? Post 9/11/01, it’s an arrogant, stupid anachronism to do it the way it’s always been done, right there on the Senate Floor, before live TV -really _stupid_. …but isn’t that *the* very nature of "Conservatism"? Keeping things ‘unchanged’? If I’ve thought it, there’s unknown tens of thousands with the means and motive who have as well. Dumb assed blind traditionalists. The nature of nature is itself, change -and they fight it.
Typical lib hypocrisy. First, Mike Moore and his left wing buddies say there is no terrorist threat and Bushco has blown it out of proportion to scare the public. Now, we have this left wing liberal nutcase screaming how un-secure we are…. no wonder they lose election after election. …and in Mulay’s case, he loses erection after erection.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve often thought- *IF* there was _one_ event where the U.S. Government was gathered in one physical place and the entire event was covered live by the media… Security can only be *so* good when it comes to technology and terrorism. Fact? Post 9/11/01, it’s an arrogant, stupid anachronism to do it the way it’s always been done, right there on the Senate Floor, before live TV -really _stupid_. …but isn’t that *the* very nature of "Conservatism"? Keeping things ‘unchanged’? If I’ve thought it, there’s unknown tens of thousands with the means and motive who have as well. Dumb assed blind traditionalists. The nature of nature is itself, change -and they fight it. Typical lib hypocrisy.
You ass belch- Calling me a lib for knowing Bush is a tool is like calling me a Nazi for knowing Clinton was too. The Office of the Pres. of the U.S. hit bottom w/ Nixon and has yet to come back, regardless of political party. First, Mike Moore and his left wing buddies say there is no terrorist threat and Bushco has blown it out of proportion to scare the public.
Why you infected, smelly dick plug. I am confident that in all probability, NYC ($$$) and D.C. are at risk. The rest is GOP political posturing to keep the nation unified against the boogie man….and not them
Now, we have this left wing liberal nutcase screaming how un-secure we are…. no wonder they lose election after election.
Hmmm- I voted for Reagan and Bush Sr. When you pull your 2" embarassment out of whatever domestic pet you’re raping, type something factual. he loses erection after erection.
In your case, erection is impossible unless you’ve smeared turd on your upper lip.
.
Response:
First, Mike Moore and his left wing buddies say there is no terrorist threat and Bushco has blown it out of proportion to scare the public. Why you infected, smelly dick plug. I am confident that in all probability, NYC ($$$) and D.C. are at risk. The rest is GOP political posturing to keep the nation unified against the boogie man….and not them
That’s why if you knew anything, the President has a cabinet member tucked away somewhere in a protected environment with all the codes in case something like that happens. Same goes for some congressmen as well. Mulay fast fact #62: Mulay’s father was hanged for stealing a pig.
Response:
Cliff Hanger: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – RN "screwed up" passed Cliff, not Coat Hanger
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just in case you miss it: (Robo-clapping between each buzzword omitted for the sake of brevity) 2006 Budget Accomplishments Accountability Afghanistan African-American Al Queda Alternative Energy Axis of Evil Blame Game Brave Soldiers Bring terrorists to justice Bringing liberty Broad support Changed world Coalition Common good Compassion Compassionate Conservatism Compete Continued commitment Corporate scandals Creating jobs Cut and Run Dangerous times Death Tax Defend America Defend marriage Democracy Dictator(s) Duty of all Americans Economic Growth Economy Educational opportunity Election Election Reform Eliminate terrorist safe havens Encourage investment Encourage liberty Encourage production Enduring values Equality and justice Evildoers Expanding economy Extreme Islamic Fundamentalists Extremism Face a future Faith FEMA Fight them there Force for good Forces of terror Freedom Freedom from fear Frontiers of freedom Fuel Prices Gasoline Good people Got ‘em on the run Great opportunity Greatest purpose Hamas Hard work Health care reform Heck of a Job Higher standards Historical Times Hold us back Homeland Security Hope Hot on their trail Hurricane Katrina IEDs Illegal Immigrants Increase (our) production Innovative spirit Insurgency Intelligence Iraq Iraqi Democracy Iraqi Freedom Iraqi Vote Jobs of the future Korea Level the playing field Liberal Liberated millions Liberty Lobbyists Marriage Medicare reform Medicare/Medicaid Military Families Modernize Moral responsibility Morality National energy policy Nine Eleven No Child Left Behind Not discriminate against NSA Nuclear proliferation Our Allies Our children Our commitments Our grandchildren Ownership Palestinian Pandemic Peaceful Society Personal accounts Productivity Prosperity Protect our border Protect the environment Protect the homeland Public service Rebuild Reform Religious Renew again Resolve is needed Resolve Prosperity Rewrite History Rogue nations Sacrifice Saddam Hussein Safe Sanctity/Peace Senior Citizens Sept. 11 Shake our will Share Shut down their financing Social Security Stay the Course Struggle Students Supporting our troops Sustained progress Tax Relief Tell(ing) the truth Terrorist Cells Terrorist Surveillance Program Terrorist(s) The Democrats Threat of nuclear Tough road ahead Training camps Transform Troops Uncertainty and weakness Undermining our Efforts Unemployment Values Veterans Victory Vision that guides us War on terror Weapons of Mass Destruction Win(ning) Wisdom Withdrawal WMDs Working families
Regards, Rich Koerner, Time Electronics. http://www.timeelect.com Specialists in Live Sound FOH Engineering, Music & Studio Production, Vintage Instruments, and Tube Amplifiers
Response:
I assumed the marble-mouthed orator was a given. bk (thousands of hours on thousands of new production tubes. The good ones of course…)
Response:
Bush Speech To Set Course For Second Term By Jeff Gannon Talon News February 2, 2005 WASHINGTON (Talon News) — President Bush will deliver his fifth State of the Union address on Wednesday, the first of his second term. The president will put forward an ambitious agenda which includes new initiatives and some which he was unable to achieve in his first term. The speech will be evenly divided between foreign and domestic policy, and dominated by the war on terror and Social Security reform. The address to a joint session of Congress will last about 45 minutes not counting pauses for applause. A larger and decidedly more conservative Republican majority in both houses is planning a boisterous show of support for the president. Where the president’s inaugural address only two weeks ago used broad strokes to describe the direction he would lead the country in the next four years, Wednesday’s speech will provide more of the details. A senior White House official said that following the address there would be "no doubt" where the president stands on Social Security. Bush will use the nationally televised event to speak not only to Congress, but directly to the American people as well. Last week he vowed to take the Social Security debate to the citizenry and will depart Washington on Thursday morning to begin a five-state tour to talk about his plan for reform. While details of his proposal will be offered to advance the debate, specific legislation will not be a part of the speech. The president will provide an explanation of why he has decided to take on what many have said is a politically perilous issue. He will also discuss ways to permanently fix the retirement program and how personal retirement accounts will help accomplish that goal. Other domestic policy issues will also be a part of the speech. Bush will speak about the growing economy and his plans to maintain and build on the momentum spurred by his tax cuts. He will again call on Congress to make those tax cuts permanent and repeal the death tax. The president will reiterate his plan for broad tax reform that he hopes will make the system fairer and simpler. A key point will be a commitment to fiscal discipline that will shrink the deficits caused by a loss of revenue from the recession and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The budget the president will submit to Congress will propose little or no increases in non-defense, non-discretionary spending. However, no spending cuts are planned. Other economic topics will include legal reform, passing a comprehensive energy policy, education, and job training initiatives. Social issues will be a part of the speech as well. Conservatives are expecting pronouncements that echo promises President Bush made on the campaign trail with regard to family values, including abortion and protecting traditional marriage. The president will use the opportunity of having the full Senate before him to urge its members to end the practice of filibustering judicial nominees. He will ask that all of his nominees be treated fairly, receiving an up or down vote on the Senate floor. Democrats have used a Senate rule to keep at least a dozen nominees from being considered, even though those judges had the votes for confirmation. His comments will set the tone for the battle over the next Supreme Court nominee, likely to be waged early in his second term. Bush will also spend a good portion of the foreign policy speech paying tribute to the men and women who have paid the ultimate sacrifice to fight terror, secure freedom, and spread democracy. He will speak directly to those individuals that are fighting for freedom around the world, both soldiers and citizens. The Middle East will dominate the balance of his foreign policy remarks. He will cite historic elections in Palestine, Afghanistan, and Iraq as precursors to a transformation of the birthplace of civilization from a breeding ground for hatred to a fertile garden of hope.
Response:
Bush Speech To Set Course For Second Term By Jeff Gannon Talon News
jeff gannon is well known for asking loaded pro-republican questions at white house press briefings. talon news is an arm of the republican party. they have as much credibility as armstrong williams, maggie gallagher and michael mcmanus – wholly owned and paid for by the bush white house. see jeff gannon "reporting" at http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/200501260015
Response:
Bush Speech To Set Course For Second Term By Jeff Gannon Talon News February 2, 2005 WASHINGTON (Talon News) — President Bush will deliver his fifth State of the Union address on Wednesday, the first of his second term. The president will put forward an ambitious agenda which includes new initiatives and some which he was unable to achieve in his first term.
Any info from Talon news and jeff Gannon is simply an advertisement for Bush. Other journalists are wondering how this turkey got a White House press pass.
Response:
A serious speech from a serious President. J
Response:
I was struck by the overall religiosity of the speech–in tone and in specifics–which was really offensive. This prez, pandering to part of his "base"–the religious right–seems willing to leave no secularist tradition unstoned. As in the Middle East, he seems willing to reap the whirlwind for short-term political or financial gain.
America’s version of the Ayatollah.
Response:
These things are always varying degrees of tedious and platitudinous. However, I was struck by the overall religiosity of the speech–in tone and in specifics–which was really offensive. This prez, pandering to part of his "base"–the religious right–seems willing to leave no secularist tradition unstoned. As in the Middle East, he seems willing to reap the whirlwind for short-term political or financial gain.
Islamists point to Allah in their political speeches, Bush invokes the Christian God. Religiosity is frightening whatever it points to. The Almighty told me she is sick of this crap and a plague on both their houses. And plague it will be. and soon.
Response:
: :
: : : : : : : : : : His "neat new programs" is just smoke and mirrors because he knows he : : doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting re-elected with : : an economy like this. He also doesn’t want to go to war too early : : because he knows what happened to his pappy in a few short months. : : Thumper : : : : That is an interesting point — people are reluctant to throw out a : : President in time of war. My family, rock ribbed Republicans all, : : voted for FDR because "we can’t change horses in the middle : : of the stream". So perhaps having a war going at the time of : : the next election is indeed a strategy. And if the economy is still : : bad, he can blame it on the war. Nifty! Clever Bush. : : And the damn idiots at the DNC now are doing all they can to make sure the : war gets held off until the next cycle. Those guys get more and more : brilliant as the days go by. : : : Not true. Most don’t want war at all. There is no need to have a war : against an "enemy" who is surrounded and starving. : thumper How about you give me the name of one person at the DNC, that has said they do NOT want to go to war at all. — The benchwarmers always know best how the game should be played. Brooks Gregory www.campaignline.com http://capwiz.com/congressorg/
Response:
AA and other relious programs have been praised to the heavens, and of course it/they DO work for some people. Good. But AA has a very high rate of recidivism–much higher than cognitive therapy-based programs such as Rational Recovery and similar therapies, I believe–and religious folks often try to get such better or more effective therapies banned from prisons, from public funds, etc. They’d rather save souls than cure addictions, too often. Public funds for religious programs which do not work too well are better than public funds for non-religious programs whcih work BETTER, and this bothers me as both a practical person and an non-religious humanist who finds govt support for religion and relgiosity offensive. And in this and many other cases, flat-out the wrong option. John
Response:
When I was a kid, our textbks taught that by the turn of the next century, world govt would have eliminated nation-states. Shows how optimistic we once were–and wrong.
Where did you go to school?
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What nearly all of these programs have in common and what really helps people is the positive group support and repetition of same. They all have a policy of continued attendance at meetings where people that have the same type of problem give comfort, advice and sympathy. Many feel it’s easier to give themselves over to a higher power but I’m not so sure that the success rate is higher than that of the determined people that choose to take responsibility for changing their lives without this tactic. As you said, the recidivism is high. Thumper Certainly those in rehab programs get more solid advice on how to avoid relapse from their fellow sufferers than from Jesus. I know many people believe Jesus talks to them, but there is enough hallucinating and such among drug users not to encourage that sort of thing:) I wonder if Jesus is talking to George Bush about the Gulf War? Never thought I’d see the day where the President got so religiously sickening in the State of the Union address. "Yes, folks, I am going to bomb Iraq — praise the Lord and pass the ammunitiion." Anti-religous fanaticism from the best in the business. Bush kicked your asses and you lefties can’t take it.
Sounds like they’ve all became atheists.
Response:
These things are always varying degrees of tedious and platitudinous. However, I was struck by the overall religiosity of the speech–in tone and in specifics–which was really offensive. This prez, pandering to part of his "base"–the religious right–seems willing to leave no secularist tradition unstoned. As in the Middle East, he seems willing to reap the whirlwind for short-term political or financial gain. The US controls the UN so completely that it is hopeless to dream that body could execute a real slap-down, but perhaps some small efforts will have some effect. When I was a kid, our textbks taught that by the turn of the next century, world govt would have eliminated nation-states. Shows how optimistic we once were–and wrong. John (closely related to some founders of the League of NAtions, the World Court, the UN, and the Nuremburg Trials—Republicans all, BTW!)
Response:
What nearly all of these programs have in common and what really helps people is the positive group support and repetition of same. They all have a policy of continued attendance at meetings where people that have the same type of problem give comfort, advice and sympathy. Many feel it’s easier to give themselves over to a higher power but I’m not so sure that the success rate is higher than that of the determined people that choose to take responsibility for changing their lives without this tactic. As you said, the recidivism is high. Thumper
Certainly those in rehab programs get more solid advice on how to avoid relapse from their fellow sufferers than from Jesus. I know many people believe Jesus talks to them, but there is enough hallucinating and such among drug users not to encourage that sort of thing:) I wonder if Jesus is talking to George Bush about the Gulf War? Never thought I’d see the day where the President got so religiously sickening in the State of the Union address. "Yes, folks, I am going to bomb Iraq — praise the Lord and pass the ammunitiion."
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – What temptations, such as drug addiction, did Jesus overcome? Basically, he was anti-Capitalist and kick the money changers out of the temple. He could not be classed as pro-rich. If he appeared again with his program for the poor he would be crucified again. Earl Moreover, as the Son of God, he was incapable of sin. I am not sure that drug addiction is a sin, because it is a problem of the body becoming addicted to certain substances. AA relies on belief in a "higher power", although they do not define that higher power in religious terms. All drug rehab programs use motivational techniques of some sort. They do try to change the users’ belief systems that they MUST use drugs. All drug rehab programs have some successes and many failures. The recividist rate is high. Just as it is for alcoholics who join AA. The programs all tend to emphasize the successes, not the failures. AA has some groups that do not use the higher power theme. The members object to what they consider a religious theme and do the program as is, except for the higher power business. Others just interpet the "higher power" to mean whatever they want it to mean. Jesus was not a right wing Republican, that we know for sure. He hung out with the lower classes and made short shrift of the moralizers of his day. I don’t think he would feel much at home in the Bush White House. Ashcroft in particular would surely appall him.
What nearly all of these programs have in common and what really helps people is the positive group support and repetition of same. They all have a policy of continued attendance at meetings where people that have the same type of problem give comfort, advice and sympathy. Many feel it’s easier to give themselves over to a higher power but I’m not so sure that the success rate is higher than that of the determined people that choose to take responsibility for changing their lives without this tactic. As you said, the recidivism is high. Thumper
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – : : : : : His "neat new programs" is just smoke and mirrors because he knows he : doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting re-elected with : an economy like this. He also doesn’t want to go to war too early : because he knows what happened to his pappy in a few short months. : Thumper : : That is an interesting point — people are reluctant to throw out a : President in time of war. My family, rock ribbed Republicans all, : voted for FDR because "we can’t change horses in the middle : of the stream". So perhaps having a war going at the time of : the next election is indeed a strategy. And if the economy is still : bad, he can blame it on the war. Nifty! Clever Bush. And the damn idiots at the DNC now are doing all they can to make sure the war gets held off until the next cycle. Those guys get more and more brilliant as the days go by.
Not true. Most don’t want war at all. There is no need to have a war against an "enemy" who is surrounded and starving. thumper – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -I swear my 4 year old nephew could run a better political operation than the bunch they have up there now. Sooner or later, they are going to have to face the reality that this President is going to deal with Saddam. Regardless of whether he is correct in doing so, he is going to deal with him. So the Democrats should be climbing on board and pushing for sooner rather than later. That is, if they want to make a political issue out of war, which I think they do and which I think is a huge mistake. But the new guys have got to learn somehow. I guess a foot in the face is as good a way as any. If they had any sense at all, they would get "war" out of their thoughts. And when asked, say "in war, we will always support our Commander in Chief, but as the defense of America is his charge, we must focus on the domestic side of the equation and that is what we are going to do". It won’t win them back the Presidency, but it would be a near lead pipe cinch to win them back the Congress.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – : : : : : His "neat new programs" is just smoke and mirrors because he knows he : doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting re-elected with : an economy like this. He also doesn’t want to go to war too early : because he knows what happened to his pappy in a few short months. : Thumper : : That is an interesting point — people are reluctant to throw out a : President in time of war. My family, rock ribbed Republicans all, : voted for FDR because "we can’t change horses in the middle : of the stream". So perhaps having a war going at the time of : the next election is indeed a strategy. And if the economy is still : bad, he can blame it on the war. Nifty! Clever Bush. And the damn idiots at the DNC now are doing all they can to make sure the war gets held off until the next cycle. Those guys get more and more brilliant as the days go by. I swear my 4 year old nephew could run a better political operation than the bunch they have up there now. Sooner or later, they are going to have to face the reality that this President is going to deal with Saddam. Regardless of whether he is correct in doing so, he is going to deal with him. So the Democrats should be climbing on board and pushing for sooner rather than later. That is, if they want to make a political issue out of war, which I think they do and which I think is a huge mistake. But the new guys have got to learn somehow. I guess a foot in the face is as good a way as any. If they had any sense at all, they would get "war" out of their thoughts. And when asked, say "in war, we will always support our Commander in Chief, but as the defense of America is his charge, we must focus on the domestic side of the equation and that is what we are going to do". It won’t win them back the Presidency, but it would be a near lead pipe cinch to win them back the Congress. — The benchwarmers always know best how the game should be played. Brooks Gregory www.campaignline.com http://capwiz.com/congressorg/
Hey, don’t knock it! At the rate they’re going, they’ll soon be a forgotten party.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Long on rhetoric, short on substance. First, he IS a politician. grin Second, what do you want? To read the intelligence reports yourself??? Ain’t gonna happen. Sounded like he got his hydrogen car briefings directly from Mel. Like Mel, he didn’t address the cost of obtaining the hyrodogen. Clueless. He proposes to provide funds for research, not production. He had a chance to present some solid evidence that we should be going to war with Iraq and blew it. He gave no substantiation for his claims. That will be provided on 5 Feb.
Want to bet? Thumper – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lots of neat new programs. Provide aids medication to Africa so aids victims can live longer and infect more people at the cost of many billions to us. So, the obvious course is to kill ‘em off quickly???? Many increases in spending and tax cuts. The unspoken message is loud and clear, do your financial planning assuming significant inflation. My plan was always to get a million dollars in debt and pray for inflation. grin cheers bob
Response:
: : Note all of the idiotic/clever religiosity–EVERYthing will be done through : churches,soon—even defence? : : John : : The drug rehab programs Bush is lauding rely on faith in Jesus : Christ to get off drugs. I really don’t think Jesus wants to take : this on. I hope he tells Bush so:) : You are so far off base on that one, I’m almost inclined to believe you don’t really do the work you claim. I have been working with Cenacor up in Houston. They teach faith in Jesus but they teach it, and I understand many others do as well, in the context that Jesus was a virtuous person and was of such strong will that he was able to overcome all temptation and deal with life on it’s own terms. Having faith in the possibility that you can do the same and reap the same benefits is what it is all about. Maybe teaching faith in Ozzy Osbourne in the context that once you cook your brain into well done, you won’t have to worry anymore. — The benchwarmers always know best how the game should be played. Brooks Gregory www.campaignline.com http://capwiz.com/congressorg/
Response:
What temptations, such as drug addiction, did Jesus overcome? Basically, he was anti-Capitalist and kick the money changers out of the temple. He could not be classed as pro-rich. If he appeared again with his program for the poor he would be crucified again. Earl
Moreover, as the Son of God, he was incapable of sin. I am not sure that drug addiction is a sin, because it is a problem of the body becoming addicted to certain substances. AA relies on belief in a "higher power", although they do not define that higher power in religious terms. All drug rehab programs use motivational techniques of some sort. They do try to change the users’ belief systems that they MUST use drugs. All drug rehab programs have some successes and many failures. The recividist rate is high. Just as it is for alcoholics who join AA. The programs all tend to emphasize the successes, not the failures. AA has some groups that do not use the higher power theme. The members object to what they consider a religious theme and do the program as is, except for the higher power business. Others just interpet the "higher power" to mean whatever they want it to mean. Jesus was not a right wing Republican, that we know for sure. He hung out with the lower classes and made short shrift of the moralizers of his day. I don’t think he would feel much at home in the Bush White House. Ashcroft in particular would surely appall him.
Response:
What temptations, such as drug addiction, did Jesus overcome?
Basically, he was anti-Capitalist and kick the money changers out of the temple. He could not be classed as pro-rich. If he appeared again with his program for the poor he would be crucified again. Earl
Response:
The benchwarmers always know best how the game should be played.
Sounds as if you are experiencing some sour grapes re: the DNC. Did someone force you into early retirement against your wishes? You, being out of it, have to join the benchwarmers, no? I don’t believe pure political expediency holds up for long, and most Dems believe a rush to war in Iraq is a mistake. You are suggesting, in the interests of getting elected, they should go against what they believe? Another comment on the benchwarmer theme. In a democracy the benchwarmers do have something to say about how the game should be played. They make that clear in every election. Perhaps you would prefer a different form of government?
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – : : Note all of the idiotic/clever religiosity–EVERYthing will be done through : churches,soon—even defence? : : John : : The drug rehab programs Bush is lauding rely on faith in Jesus : Christ to get off drugs. I really don’t think Jesus wants to take : this on. I hope he tells Bush so:) : You are so far off base on that one, I’m almost inclined to believe you don’t really do the work you claim. I have been working with Cenacor up in Houston. They teach faith in Jesus but they teach it, and I understand many others do as well, in the context that Jesus was a virtuous person and was of such strong will that he was able to overcome all temptation and deal with life on it’s own terms. Having faith in the possibility that you can do the same and reap the same benefits is what it is all about.
What temptations, such as drug addiction, did Jesus overcome? So far as I know he had a forty day and forty night battle with Satan in the desert. But then, he was the Son of God, so of course he won. You don’t think God’s son would have a weak will, do you? As a role model for junkies, perhaps someone a bit more down to earth would be more helpful. And when public funds are involved, more in line with the notion that Congress should not make laws supporting one religion over another? I have no problem with individuals choosing one rehab program another. I do have a problem with the government handing out money to promote religious doctrine. Even in a "good cause".
Response:
His "neat new programs" is just smoke and mirrors because he knows he doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting re-elected with an economy like this. He also doesn’t want to go to war too early because he knows what happened to his pappy in a few short months. Thumper
That is an interesting point — people are reluctant to throw out a President in time of war. My family, rock ribbed Republicans all, voted for FDR because "we can’t change horses in the middle of the stream". So perhaps having a war going at the time of the next election is indeed a strategy. And if the economy is still bad, he can blame it on the war. Nifty! Clever Bush.
Response:
Note all of the idiotic/clever religiosity–EVERYthing will be done through churches,soon—even defence? John
The drug rehab programs Bush is lauding rely on faith in Jesus Christ to get off drugs. I really don’t think Jesus wants to take this on. I hope he tells Bush so:)
Response:
: : : : : His "neat new programs" is just smoke and mirrors because he knows he : doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting re-elected with : an economy like this. He also doesn’t want to go to war too early : because he knows what happened to his pappy in a few short months. : Thumper : : That is an interesting point — people are reluctant to throw out a : President in time of war. My family, rock ribbed Republicans all, : voted for FDR because "we can’t change horses in the middle : of the stream". So perhaps having a war going at the time of : the next election is indeed a strategy. And if the economy is still : bad, he can blame it on the war. Nifty! Clever Bush. And the damn idiots at the DNC now are doing all they can to make sure the war gets held off until the next cycle. Those guys get more and more brilliant as the days go by. I swear my 4 year old nephew could run a better political operation than the bunch they have up there now. Sooner or later, they are going to have to face the reality that this President is going to deal with Saddam. Regardless of whether he is correct in doing so, he is going to deal with him. So the Democrats should be climbing on board and pushing for sooner rather than later. That is, if they want to make a political issue out of war, which I think they do and which I think is a huge mistake. But the new guys have got to learn somehow. I guess a foot in the face is as good a way as any. If they had any sense at all, they would get "war" out of their thoughts. And when asked, say "in war, we will always support our Commander in Chief, but as the defense of America is his charge, we must focus on the domestic side of the equation and that is what we are going to do". It won’t win them back the Presidency, but it would be a near lead pipe cinch to win them back the Congress. — The benchwarmers always know best how the game should be played. Brooks Gregory www.campaignline.com http://capwiz.com/congressorg/
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Long on rhetoric, short on substance. Sounded like he got his hydrogen car briefings directly from Mel. Like Mel, he didn’t address the cost of obtaining the hyrodogen. Clueless. He had a chance to present some solid evidence that we should be going to war with Iraq and blew it. He gave no substantiation for his claims. Lots of neat new programs. Provide aids medication to Africa so aids victims can live longer and infect more people at the cost of many billions to us. Many increases in spending and tax cuts. The unspoken message is loud and clear, do your financial planning assuming significant inflation. Dick
His "neat new programs" is just smoke and mirrors because he knows he doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting re-elected with an economy like this. He also doesn’t want to go to war too early because he knows what happened to his pappy in a few short months. Thumper – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ——= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–== Over 80,000 Newsgroups – 16 Different Servers! =—–
Response:
Note all of the idiotic/clever religiosity–EVERYthing will be done through churches,soon—even defence? John
Response:
Long on rhetoric, short on substance.
First, he IS a politician. grin Second, what do you want? To read the intelligence reports yourself??? Ain’t gonna happen. Sounded like he got his hydrogen car briefings directly from Mel. Like Mel, he didn’t address the cost of obtaining the hyrodogen. Clueless.
He proposes to provide funds for research, not production. He had a chance to present some solid evidence that we should be going to war with Iraq and blew it. He gave no substantiation for his claims.
That will be provided on 5 Feb. Lots of neat new programs. Provide aids medication to Africa so aids victims can live longer and infect more people at the cost of many billions to us.
So, the obvious course is to kill ‘em off quickly???? Many increases in spending and tax cuts. The unspoken message is loud and clear, do your financial planning assuming significant inflation.
My plan was always to get a million dollars in debt and pray for inflation. grin cheers bob
Response:
Mel will prove in his gasoline series that the cost of transporting 37 million barrels of oil in huge oil burning tankers across the oceans of the world to their points of delivery–IS TOO EXCESSIVE–compared to Penn State’s getting Hydrogen from Fermentation of city waste treatment feed stock– Let alone the oil burned to boil the crude in the distillation process to produce gasoline !Hang in there with me. This was posted by a THINKING LIBERAL of the ‘Silent Revolution,Truth is our only PATRIOTS business. melvin WW 2 ETO Reg Army DAV VFW Amer Leg 55 YEARS UNION age 83 yrs.,
Response:
I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. I woudn’t know. My TV set started acting up about 9:15 EST last night. It may have been because I kicked the screen in about that time
:-| :-| :-| (The above is supposed to be somebody laughing three times) I avoided watching the speech, so I wasn’t subject to the temptation.
Response:
(The above is supposed to be somebody laughing three times)
I thought it had to be Zorro. — http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2006/1/31/74439/9483 http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L30592669.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/30/ AR2006013001162_pf.html In favor of reality absed government.
Response:
(The above is supposed to be somebody laughing three times) I thought it had to be Zorro.
Now that you mention it, it does conjure up Zorro in my mind, too. I don’t know why. Maybe it’s just your suggestion, or maybe it’s some subliminal thing that I’m not detecting.
Response:
Yeh right, you did that so your wife would let you buy the new big screen plasma tv On a serious note, I have been thinking about getting a larger screen TV. Not a plasma but a flat screen about 32 inches.
The latest Consumers Report has a review of TV sets, Sony CRT is still the sharpest but non-CRT are gaining. They say wait for the sales to buy. — Glenn
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Yeh right, you did that so your wife would let you buy the new big screen plasma tv On a serious note, I have been thinking about getting a larger screen TV. Not a plasma but a flat screen about 32 inches. On thing has been holding me back, and that is the extreme closeups they use these days on TV movies. Seeing nothing of a person’s face except the eyeballs, nose hairs and mouth is something I find disgusting enough on a 21 inch. I hate to think of seeing it any larger. Most of my evening TV viewing is political interview type programs and who really wants to see a larger version of Larry King and Sean Hannity ? I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. I woudn’t know. My TV set started acting up about 9:15 EST last night. It may have been because I kicked the screen in about that time
I am looking at getting a big screen also. I have a 53" Sony analog. A 50" plasm is too small and the 60" cost way way TOO much. Think I’ll go for a Samsung 56-60" DLP.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. Doesn’t take very much to impress you reactionaries, does it? If you start from the premise that this is an unreality-based administration, in which so often words have no meaning, including those in the law, it was an interesting exercise in rhetoric. Whereas reality based rule making let 24 miners survive a mine fire that wasn’t put out for days in Canada our unreality based rule making set up our miners to die. "Who" is on first, "Idont Know" is on second and you are way in left field. Sounds like one of those liberal freaks like "Shithan" or what ever her name is. Oh yes! they had a nasty accident in Florida maybe you can blame it on Bush.
There you go. Jump right to name calling. The administration chose to ignore the law and folks died. — http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2006/1/31/74439/9483 http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L30592669.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/30/ AR2006013001162_pf.html In favor of reality absed government.
Response:
I have never been able to figure out why Larry King draws such an audience. That makes two of us. I can’t figure out how a lot of people on TV these days got there.
Simple….they pitch EVERYTHING towards the acne generation which should explain why I don’t watch most of their stuff either. As far as Larry King is concerned, I used to watch him but I never liked him. I think his personality sucks and I stopped punishing myself many moons ago by the simple expedient of changing the station when he came on. George Z.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. Doesn’t take very much to impress you reactionaries, does it? If you start from the premise that this is an unreality-based administration, in which so often words have no meaning, including those in the law, it was an interesting exercise in rhetoric. Whereas reality based rule making let 24 miners survive a mine fire that wasn’t put out for days in Canada our unreality based rule making set up our miners to die.
"Who" is on first, "Idont Know" is on second and you are way in left field. Sounds like one of those liberal freaks like "Shithan" or what ever her name is. Oh yes! they had a nasty accident in Florida maybe you can blame it on Bush. — Bill P. just Dog & ME At this time in life all that remains is left overs, some can be cherished as good others bad, but the only definite is that they are all that remains, main course is over.
Response:
I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. — BILL P. Just Dog & ME
Response:
Why ? , He didn’t mangle any of the lies, bullshit, or nazi propaganda Goebbels and Murdoch would be proud of their little Hitler Youth
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. — BILL P. Just Dog & ME
Response:
I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career.
Doesn’t take very much to impress you reactionaries, does it?
Response:
Yeh right, you did that so your wife would let you buy the new big screen plasma tv
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. I woudn’t know. My TV set started acting up about 9:15 EST last night. It may have been because I kicked the screen in about that time
Response:
I consider President Bush’s address in the State of the Union address was his best presentation of his career. Doesn’t take very much to impress you reactionaries, does it?
If you start from the premise that this is an unreality-based administration, in which so often words have no meaning, including those in the law, it was an interesting exercise in rhetoric. Whereas reality based rule making let 24 miners survive a mine fire that wasn’t put out for days in Canada our unreality based rule making set up our miners to die. — http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2006/1/31/74439/9483 http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L30592669.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/30/ AR2006013001162_pf.html In favor of reality absed government.
Response:
G’day, Congratulations President Bush on a well delivered, passionate and intelligent speech. Hope he gets the support he needs from congress. I hope the countries he mentioned regarding terrorism are suitably embarrassed (and warned). Warm Regards, Ron Lawrence, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Response:
Ron Lawrence said: "Congratulations President Bush on a well delivered, passionate and intelligent speech. Hope he gets the support he needs from congress. I hope the countries he mentioned regarding terrorism are suitably embarrassed (and warned)." Ditto—— Lon
Response:
I agree – it was an excellent speech.
Response:
Congratulations President Bush on a well delivered, passionate and intelligent speech. Hope he gets the support he needs from congress. I hope the countries he mentioned regarding terrorism are suitably embarrassed (and warned).
I hear nothing but good about Bush’s speech. I listened to it twice last evening. There was so much applause, he had difficulty getting through it. He is enjoying the highest positive rating from Americans for the last 50 years. He is not a natural dynamic speaker like Clinton was, but he makes up for that in content. Bush is staying very focused on the terrorism issue, which was a concern of mine. The response from the three countries he mentioned will be interesting. I got the impression that something is already going on in those countries. It isn’t just a warning. -Connie
Response:
G’day, Connie writes:
"I got the impression that something is already going on in those countries. It isn’t just a warning." I am certain the US has intelligence on these countries that warrants the warning – perhaps harbouring important Al Qaeda terrorists who escaped from Afghanistan is part of it. I do not believe the US is going into Iraq soon, if ever. I cannot believe there will be a pre-emptive strike – it takes months to plan and build up the required forces – not easily hidden. I could be proved wrong of course – there’s room for more crosses on the wall <G. I think the pressure to allow UN inspectors back into Iraq is mounting and Bush is just adding of that pressure. I am not as certain about the other countries he mentioned but the attitude of the coalition, including Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries, will be crucial to this decision. Warm Regards, Ron Lawrence, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Categories: